tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post8533682525388258971..comments2024-03-18T21:33:55.514-04:00Comments on Doug Ross @ Journal: No Wonder the EPA is Illegally Hiding Its Temperature DataUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-56489931155935285822013-09-10T17:17:02.456-04:002013-09-10T17:17:02.456-04:00Whoops!! Too bad the climate "scientists&quo...Whoops!! Too bad the climate "scientists" faking their data for monetary and political gain will never apologize now their argument has failed:<br /><br />http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/09/sorry-irthers-the-arctic-ice-cap-has-returned/<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-57539553276435499072013-09-10T09:59:51.411-04:002013-09-10T09:59:51.411-04:00If the real-world data does not fit your model, do...If the real-world data does not fit your model, do you a) adjust your model to account for the data or b) adjust the data to fit your model? If you chose b) then congratulations! You're a "scientist" according to the Left.CavalierXhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04699119334538291337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-34063281471020185772013-09-10T09:33:12.189-04:002013-09-10T09:33:12.189-04:00"You left out another reason to believe in gl..."You left out another reason to believe in global warming:<br /><br />Accepting the science."<br /><br />Accepting the science? Most of the world's truly great scientific discoveries came about because someone didn't just "accept" the prevailing science of the time. Science is an inherently skeptical discipline based on endless questioning and challenging of the assertions and conclusions of those who came before you. Even physics, unless you don't think Einstein and Quantum Physics aren't great leaps in understanding forward from Newtonian physics that required us to challenge those ideas.<br /><br />As to the notion that world is getting warmer? Well, yes it has been ... ever since the last ice age. Has mankind polluted that far back in history to cause that rise in temperatures? Doubtful. Therefore, any rise in temperature must be attributed to natural climate variations, and what nature causes, she can also reverse.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-75528626075356094402013-09-10T03:19:15.910-04:002013-09-10T03:19:15.910-04:00"If you choose not to believe climatologists ..."If you choose not to believe climatologists and still believe other scientists, then why?" Ah, here's the central point. I do not believe any scientist. I believe provable scientific facts. The thinking here seems to be that because scientists have accomplished such amazing things -- rockets and computers and all that -- there therefore we should blindly believe anything said by anyone who calls himself a scientist. But, umm, the people arrogating this authority to themselves are not the ones who invented rockets and computers and all that. They just call themselves by the same name as those who did, and then demand the respect that those people earned. Sorry, no.<br /><br />I don't care what any authority says. If you have evidence to back up your claim, then show me the evidence, and I'll believe it because of the evidence, not because you said so. If you don't have evidence to back up your claim, then the fact that some authority said it's so is worth nothing. Either way, I don't care what the authorities say. I care about the evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-11976143065141360282013-09-09T22:53:03.977-04:002013-09-09T22:53:03.977-04:00Ahh, a religious true believer. I'd point and...Ahh, a religious true believer. I'd point and laugh, but it'll be so delicious when they discover embarrassment.Mr Evilwrenchnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-8930871399913720542013-09-09T22:44:44.799-04:002013-09-09T22:44:44.799-04:00Anonymous stated "If you choose not to believ...Anonymous stated "If you choose not to believe climatologists and still believe other scientists, then why?"<br /><br />Perhaps because these climate "scientists" of which you speak have routinely been caught cherry picking and manipulating their data to fit their preconceived models. They act with arrogance and impunity because they're backed by powerful interests with deep pockets. They "lose" their raw data and only release the "adjusted" data sets and you expect us to believe them?<br /><br />Show me the carfax!<br /><br />The saddest part is that even astrologers are more accurate (and probably more ethical)in their forecasts and predictions than climatologists. <br /><br />The proven decadence and corruption of "climate science" has rendered it the laughing stock of the scientific community, and and embarrassment to true scientists everywhere.<br /><br />And yet you ask why we choose not to believe them. Eventually even you will not be able to "hide the decline" of people subscribing to your myth and scam.Arielnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-92095928666720622372013-09-09T22:04:39.253-04:002013-09-09T22:04:39.253-04:00You left out another reason to believe in global w...You left out another reason to believe in global warming:<br /><br />Accepting the science.<br /><br />Physics is not politics. Just because Leftists are trying to leverage global warming against capitalism and are proposing all kinds of idiotic fixes does NOT mean it isn't real.<br /><br />We're close to the point where denying global warming is as irrational as denying evolution. The science is solid and the data from multiple lines of evidence all converge on the same conclusion.<br /><br />If you choose not to believe climatologists and still believe other scientists, then why?<br /><br />The Telegraph completely blew the story on that "leak", BTW.<br /><br />http://www.skeptical-science.com/science/arctic-sea-ice-delusions-strike-mail-sunday-telegraph/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com