Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trump. Show all posts

Sunday, March 19, 2017

SPAIN: Still on the Agenda of the Militant Lutherans

By Hugh Fitzgerald

“We will recover al-Andalus, Allah willing. Oh dear Andalus! You thought we forgot about you. I swear by Allah we have never forgotten you. No Muslim can forget Córdoba, Toledo or Xàtiva. There are many faithful and sincere Muslims who swear they will return to al-Andalus.” — Islamic State video, January 31, 2016

Muslims are keenly aware that they once controlled most of the Iberian Peninsula, and that it took the Christians 700 years of war, the Reconquista, to recover, kingdom by kingdom, all of that territory. The final victory over the Muslims took place in 1492, when the Kingdom of Granada was won by the Christians. There are now many millions of Muslims all over Europe, in France, Great Britain, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Scandinavia, always much in the news because of the disruptions that they cause, as they challenge the laws and customs of the Infidels, vacuum up every conceivable welfare-state benefit, repay their benefactors with skyrocketing rates of criminality, and commit acts of terrorism as a useful adjunct to the relentless demographic conquest and stealth jihad inflicted on their unhappy hosts. And Spain, though it does not as yet have as large a Muslim presence as that found elsewhere in Europe. remains quite special in Muslim hearts.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

SPEAK TRUTH: The Reagan Approach to Crushing Radical Islam

By Lawrence Sellin

Many experts, genuine or self-proclaimed, assert that the battle against radical Islam will be won, not so much by killing its adherents, but by discrediting the ideology.

That sounds profound indeed, yet, what exactly does it mean?

Former Trump National Security Advisor retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn in his 2016 book "The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies," suggested using psychological operations and counter-propaganda, through federal government channels, schools, media and social networks to discredit the "evil (religious) doctrines" motivating jihadists.

Friday, March 17, 2017

HYPOCRISY-METER EXPLODES: New York Lyin’ Times Suddenly Appalled by Presidential Overreach

By William Teach

Suddenly, the Constitution matters to The New York Lyin' Times [Ed: which is the name they prefer, I hear], according to Martin H. "Nebbish" Redish:

Trump Is Not Above the Courts

So much has happened during these early weeks of President Trump’s administration that it is easy to lose sight of the single event that may well have the most powerful and troubling impact on American democratic society.

Thursday, March 16, 2017

WHEN LEFTIST JUDGES DIDN'T COMPLAIN: 2014 --- To Protect Tourism, Hawaii Paid Homeless to Leave

By Sara Noble

Remember in 2014, when Hawaii gave the homeless one-way tickets out of Hawaii? Why do we have to take refugees from terror nations who haven’t gone through “extreme vetting”?

They wanted to keep them away from tourists but somehow tourists won’t be aghast at thousands of poorly screened and potential jihadists from Iran, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, Yemen, and Syria.

THOMAS JEFFERSON: His opinion on our radical leftist "Judges"

The brilliant words of Thomas Jefferson echo through the ages, a slap in the face to rogue despots wearing black robes.

You seem to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy...

LEVIN: We Are Living Under Judicial Anarchy!

By Nate Madden

On “The Mark Levin Show” Wednesday night, Conservative Review’s editor-in-chief called out “rogue judges” in today’s “judicial anarchy,” as one Derrick Watson, a federal judge in Hawaii, blocked President Trump’s second draft of the executive order suspending travel from six high-risk countries.

“We have, ladies and gentlemen, rogue federal district judges now; we have rogue courts,” Levin exclaimed. “We have judicial anarchy taking place … where judges are seizing plenary authority from the president of the United States to keep this nation safe — to control our borders and to determine the nature of our immigration in this country.”

Monday, March 13, 2017

SHADOW STATE: Obama's Role in Undermining Trump's Presidency

By Cliff Kincaid

The media continue to publish and broadcast stories about how Donald Trump won the election with the help of the Russians, calling this "collusion," though no such evidence has surfaced. Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper has stated  that he had "no knowledge of evidence of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign." Assertions of Russian influence have been latched onto by Democrats and a liberal media with the sole intention of delegitimizing the Trump administration.

After all, the media, and Democrats, clearly would prefer to return to the age of Obama. While hearings are planned  for March 20 by the House Intelligence Committee to look into the issue of Russian influence in the presidential election, as well as President Trump's claim that Obama ordered wiretaps and surveillance on parts of his campaign-charges that have repeatedly been called "baseless"-there are other tracks  that I have suggested that investigators and journalists should probe.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

You won't believe the 50 websites Harvard has labeled "Fake News"

Your betters at the Harvard University Library have published a guide to "Fake News Sites" that includes a bevy of real news sites that happen to lean right. Among them: the Heritage Foundation, Conservative Review, and Wikileaks, the latter of which has revealed (whether you agree with its approach or not) some very real news indeed.

This, my friends, is a dangerous game. Just as Snopes and Politifact are reliable Democrat public relations outlets (remember when the latter played both sides on ‘If You Like Your Plan, You Can Keep It’?), anyone claiming to be an arbiter of truth is inherently suspect.

Because progressives always get it wrong, I'll repeat. The market is the only arbiter for media. The marketplace of ideas dictates who wins and loses.

Based upon a simple comparison of ratings, MSNBC and CNN are considered very, very fake news when it lines up against Fox News. And which means National Public Radio is also faux news.

Some here's my list of the top 50 sites labeled by Harvard as 'False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical “News” Sources':

Saturday, March 11, 2017

DEAR AP PROPAGANDIST JONATHAN LEMIRE: We're All Still Waiting for an Apology

A legacy media hack by the name of Jonathan Lemire -- if that is his real name -- continues to propagate lies about the wiretapping of President Donald Trump and the remarkable detective work of bestselling author and radio host Mark Levin. Levin helped construct a definitive and authoritative timeline into the Obama administration's criminal activities.

While most "journalists" have quietly abandoned their wiretapping jeremiads, for obvous reasons, Lemire continues to bang his Barbie-sized pots and pans, calling attention not only to his ignorance, but his patently partisan agenda.

For most with Lemire's talents, said actions wouldn't be worth mentioning. But Jon-boy happened to hook up with the antiquated wire service called the Associated Press, so his laughably false assertions have circulated far beyond what his meager talents warrant.

Consider the following; a more fraudulent sequence of lies you'd be hard-pressed to find outside of North Korea:

Friday, March 10, 2017

AMBER ALERT: Won't You Please Help Us Find the Media's "Russians-Stole-the-Election" Meme?

By Rush Limbaugh

Say, have you noticed, my friends, that the whole Russians-stole-the-election theme is gone? Have you noticed it’s not out there today? You can’t find a story on it? I’m gonna tell you why, ’cause we had a major role in this I am convinced right here on the EIB Network yesterday ’cause we nailed ’em.

Have you seen any stories about the Russians hacking the elections? It’s gone, and so is the New York Times headline from the January 20th story with “wiretaps.” They have gone back and they have changed it. “Wiretaps” is not in that headline anymore. I’ll have the details on this. There’s also two polls out there. Folks, this is big. This is exactly… I am convinced that we played a role in this. Not just yesterday, but in days in the past. Many people have, and Trump’s the actual reason why.

ABOUT TIME: Attorney General Sessions Asks All Obama Appointees in DOJ to Resign. Now.

By Tyler Durden

In a move that will likely provoke further media, and pundit, fury despite it being a routine act that is concurrent with every change in administration, Attorney General Jeff Sessions has asked all remaining Obama-appointed U.S. Attorneys for their resignation.

Sarah Isgur Flores, Director of Public Affairs at the Department of Justice, released the following statement:

Thursday, March 09, 2017

DON'T LOOK NOW: But There's a New Generation of Racists Operating Freely on Campus

By John Perazzo

The Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (MEChA), or “Chicano Student Movement,” describes itself as an organization that urges young Chicanos (people of Mexican ancestry living in the United States) to use “higher education” and “political involvement” to promote “cultural and historical pride,” “liberation,” and “self-determination” among their people. In practice, MEChA aggressively promotes anti-Americanism and anti-white hatred by relentlessly stoking the fires of racial and ethnic grievance among Latino students.

Obama Touched Off a Tidal Wave of Leaks With This One Weird Trick

By Saagar Enjeti

Former President Barack Obama made a last-minute change to the way wiretapped intelligence is shared Jan. 12, which may have contributed to the proliferation of leaks plaguing the Trump administration.

Obama changed the way National Security Agency intelligence is shared 8 days before leaving office, which allows globally intercepted communications to be disseminated across the entire intelligence community.

Wednesday, March 08, 2017

CALLUM BORCHERS OF THE WASHINGTON POST TAKES ON MARK LEVIN: He Chose... Poorly

There are certain matchups... certain competitions... that are just insane to contemplate. Godzilla vs. Bambi. Demetrius Johnson vs. Michael Moore. Floyd Mayweather vs., eh, Michael Moore. And Mark Levin vs. Callum Borchers (if that is his real name).

Borchers, who is completely unknown west of Bethesda, Maryland and east of Bethesda, Maryland, just wrote an interesting sci-fi column at the Washington Post entitled "Mark Levin is confused. Or he is trying to confuse you."

But don't bother clicking on it. Put simply, Clyde Torchers offers some awesome spin -- using a February 2017 article and not the original January reporting -- to obscure the Obama administration's very real and very obvious skulduggery.

To wit:

TWITTER ANSWERS THE CALL: How Will You Survive a "Day Without Women"?

By Daily Sheeple

Today we saw thousands of women across the country marching and striking for “The Day Without A Woman.”

We’ll avoid the politics of it all, as that’s been covered almost to the point of exhaustion by various news outlets and social media.

We will, however, take a look at the humorous side of it, because the point of a Day Without A Woman, we assume, is to show men how important they are in our lives. To be clear, no one here thinks otherwise.

When the organization that started the movement asked men how they plan to support women on March 8, some of the responses, as you can imagine, were pretty hilarious. Some are nothing short of pure brilliance, and whether male or female, we think you might just get a chuckle out of these:

Tuesday, March 07, 2017

LEVIN: Hey, Clapper---If there were no FISA warrrants, what the hell were the FBI, CIA, NSA and the rest investigating?

By Mark Levin

It is only conservatives who are concerned about what they are reading in liberal media.

Have you you noticed that? The media is very confounded right now, they are very confused. They don't know whether to trash themselves, trash their colleagues, or what.

What did Obama know? We know he knows this much: everything you just read, he knew. Because it's in the newspapers. That is pretty big. Number two, we know that if a FISA warrant was secured, it is very likely in his daily intelligence briefing or a call from the Attorney General or the director of the FBI the president would be given a heads up. There's nothing illegal about it but he would have been given a heads up.

Here's what else we know:

OBAMA'S SHADOW GOVERNMENT: Waging War Not Just Against Trump, But Against America Itself

By Daniel Greenfield

After Trump secured the nomination, Obama’s people filed a wiretapping request. As he was on the verge of winning, they did it again. After he won, they are doing everything they can to bring him down.

It was always going to come down to this.

Monday, March 06, 2017

YOU'RE GONNA NEED A BIGGER NETWORK: CNN Hack Brian Stelter Takes on Mark Levin With Predictable Results

By Chris Pandolfo

CNN’s Brian Stelter accused Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin of starting a “conspiracy theory” Monday in an article about questions Levin raised last week regarding the extent to which the Obama administration may have spied on the presidential campaign of Donald Trump.

Citing reporting by mainstream media outlets that the Obama administration sought two separate FISA court warrants to surveil the Trump campaign, Levin made the case that a congressional investigation is warranted to determine if there was any spying, and if there was, the extent of it.

Stelter, the host of "Reliable Sources," accused Levin of using “cherry-picked news stories that supported his thesis and omitted information that cut against it.”

Stelter writes:

PURE, RAW HATRED: The New York Times Told Us Trump Was Wiretapped in January

By Rush Limbaugh

There is far, far more substance to what Trump is alleging than the entire thing that the Democrats and the media are alleging. There is no evidence that the Russians had anything to do with the outcome of our election, none, and there won’t be any, because the Russians didn’t.

But there’s all kinds of evidence, circumstantial and suspicious and common sense that this is what the Obama administration did. We’ve got countless examples of them wiretapping. We’ve got their “house organ” admitting that wiretap data was used in the inquiry of Trump aides. But one of the names on this story, one of the reporters is named Michael S. Schmidt.

SPLIT PERSONALITY: @ArthurSchwartz of the @NYTimes can't make up his mind on Trump team wiretapping

"Reporter" Arthur Schwartz of the The New York Times, which claims it is a "newspaper", was just eviscerated by Jeff Dunetz.

You read that right: the same "reporter" who crowed about wiretaps of the Trump administration in January is now pretending said wiretaps never occurred.

Yes, they really are that dishonest.