Thursday, February 03, 2005

Fascist Halfwit



Click here for AmazonThe imperial leader of Syria was pegged in Slate Magazine nearly two years ago by Chris Suellentrop.

Whether you consider Bashar Assad an evil moron (per Suellentrop) or simply a fascist halfwit (my preferred term), there is no doubt that he was called out by President Bush last night in the SOTU. Suellentrop, writing in April of 2003:

By foolishly providing moral and material support to Iraq during the war—and, the administration says, now by harboring high-ranking Iraqi officials—he's created an environment that makes it possible for a Democratic presidential candidate (Florida Sen. Bob Graham) to openly support war with Syria. Already some hawks are pointing to the tantalizing parallels between Saddam's Iraq and Assad's Syria. Weapons of mass destruction? Check. Support for terrorism? Check. Repressive domestic intelligence services? Check. The comparisons go further: Both countries were ruled by tyrannical men who are not members of the ethnic majority. (Saddam was a Sunni who ruled over a largely Shiite country, and Assad is an Alawite who rules over a Sunni majority.) To top things off, Syria even has a Baath Party and a Republican Guard. No one expects war anytime soon, but Assad's stupidity has put the subject on the table.


There was hope for Assad when he took power in 2000. With an M.D. degree in Ophthalmology, granted in the U.K., there was hope Assad would throw off the shackles of fascism imposed by his father, the late Hafez Assad.

Well, it's 2005 now and Syria has continued to do some very moronic things.

  • Since 1979, it's been a State Department All-Star, listed as a nation sponsoring terrorism
  • Provides material support to Hamas
  • Permits Iran to support Hezbollah in Lebanon
  • Rumored to have taken possession of Saddam's chemical and biological weapons, moves facilitated by the corrupt leadership of France and others, who were paid to delay the war in Iraq as long as possible
  • Occupying Lebanon with troops -- ostensibly to 'protect it from Israel' -- and has installed its own puppet government and infrastructure
  • Defying a UN order to restore Lebanon's sovereignty
  • Rumored to be harboring members of Saddam's old regime

    And no matter how hard the axis of stupidity squinches their eyes shut, it's crystal clear that Syria and its dimbulb leaders are facilitating some evil, evil activity.

    The hammer can't come down fast enough on the fascist halfwit and his handlers.

    Honest Reporting: Special Report: Syria
  • Blogosphere Ascendant



    Click here for AmazonIf you happened to miss it, Eason Jordan*, the chief news executive of CNN, recently accused the US Military of assassinating journalists. Seriously. But the interesting part is not the fact that a major media exec made some outrageous, anti-American remarks. It's how the rest of the mainstream media is ignoring the story, to their continued detriment.

    Here's a report from the World Economic Forum, the venue in which he made these statements:

    During one of the discussions about the number of journalists killed in the Iraq War, Eason Jordan asserted that he knew of 12 journalists who had not only been killed by US troops in Iraq, but they had in fact been targeted. He repeated the assertion a few times, which seemed to win favor in parts of the audience (the anti-US crowd) and cause great strain on others.

    Due to the nature of the forum, I was able to directly challenge Eason, asking if he had any objective and clear evidence to backup these claims, because if what he said was true, it would make Abu Ghraib look like a walk in the park... Eason seemed to backpedal quickly, but his initial statements were backed by other members of the audience (one in particular who represented a worldwide journalist group). The ensuing debate was (for lack of better words) a real "sh--storm".


    Charles at LGF made a quick observation, which is not only true, but also has ramifications for the future of the media:

    Good luck finding any mention of this story in mainstream news. It’s being deliberately ignored.


    This vacuum of coverage, this banal acceptance of crackpot viewpoints from media royalty -- without ever reporting them -- is helping to reshape the mediasphere as we watch. A simple analysis will indicate that consumers will gravitate towards sources that deliver interesting, worthwhile news. We can rule out the dimwits at CNN, who are destined to continue their catastrophic ratings slide, so long as they employ dullards such as Jordan.

    The MSM's insistence on ignoring these big stories is equivalent to strapping on a weight-belt while learning to swim.

    * If you're looking for additional information about the Eason Jordan affair, Hugh Hewitt has some of the best coverage and link-farms going.

    Eason Jordan's Troubled History:

    Eason Jordan is also the same executive who admitted that CNN regularly covered up stories of Iraqi torture and atrocities, a Faustian bargain designed to keep the Baghdad bureau office open. It was all about money -- blood money, rather -- earned by CNN in return for its silence on crimes against humanity.

    Over the last dozen years I made 13 trips to Baghdad to lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders. Each time I visited, I became more distressed by what I saw and heard — awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff.

    For example, in the mid-1990's one of our Iraqi cameramen was abducted. For weeks he was beaten and subjected to electroshock torture in the basement of a secret police headquarters because he refused to confirm the government's ludicrous suspicion that I was the Central Intelligence Agency's Iraq station chief. CNN had been in Baghdad long enough to know that telling the world about the torture of one of its employees would almost certainly have gotten him killed and put his family and co-workers at grave risk. ...

    Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.

    I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me. Now that Saddam Hussein's regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.


    Of course, during that same period of time, Jordan was lying through his teeth in interviews like this:

    BOB GARFIELD: I'm sure you have seen Franklin Foer's article in The New Republic which charges that the Western press is appeasing the Iraqi regime in order to maintain its visas -- to be there reporting should a war ultimately break out. What's your take on that?

    EASON JORDAN: The writer clearly doesn't have a clear understanding of the realities on the ground because CNN has demonstrated again and again that it has a spine; that it's prepared to be forthright; is forthright in its reporting.


    Taranto asks one of the best questions about this episode, “What are CNN and other news organizations failing to tell us about other thuggish regimes, from communist Cuba to the Palestinian Authority?”

    A manifesto for irresponsibility



    Click here for AmazonThere are many times in a politician's career that they feel they must take a stand against popular opinion for reasons of principle: Ford's pardon of Nixon, for instance.

    Today's OJ editorial asks: what if one party takes a stand that has neither popular support nor any fundamental principles?

    That is where some of the Democratic thought-leaders find themselves today. They are not hoping for victory for their country. Instead, they are hoping for some sort of vindication for themselves. It will be a long time coming.

    ...Mr. Kerry: "No one in the United States should try to overhype this election.... It's hard to say that something is legitimate when a whole portion of the country can't and doesn't vote."

    Mr. Kennedy: "While the elections are a step forward, they are not a cure for the growing violence and resentment of the perception of American occupation. . . . The best way to demonstrate to the Iraqi people that we have no long-term designs on their country is for the Administration to withdraw some troops now . . ."

    Minority Leader Reid: "We need an exit strategy so that we know what victory is and how we can get there. . . . Iraq is clearly important, but there are so many bigger threats to our national security . . ."

    So what is the Democratic Party's message on this inspiring exercise in Iraqi self-determination? First, that the election's legitimacy is questionable. Second, that its effects will be minor. Third, that America's presence in Iraq is doing more harm than good by generating terrorism and anti-Americanism where none previously existed. Fourth, that the U.S. has better things to do. Fifth, that American sacrifices in Iraq are best redeemed not by victory, but by the earliest feasible departure.

    As a matter of policy, this is a manifesto for irresponsibility...


    OpinionJournal: A manifesto for irresponsibility

    Wednesday, February 02, 2005

    Best of the State o' the Union Live-Bloggers



    Click here for AmazonHerein I present my perceived "best of the State of the Union LiveBloggers". Do you think 'evil moron' Bashar Assad is getting the picture? If the military ever gets the go-ahead to whack that SOB, it will be a happy day for the Syrian people, a bunch of their neighbors, and the GWOT in general.

    PL: 8:10--Interesting--he includes the Palestinian territories and Ukraine along with Afghanistan and Iraq. Blue fingers in the air.

    PL: 8:13--He recites the economic record of the last four years. Might as well; viewers won't hear it anywhere else.

    CQ: 8:17 - After the usual handouts that get the pork rolling, Bush memtions tort reform and health care adjacent. He's just delivered the message to the Democrats -- if you want to talk health care, it comes with tort reform attached. Get used to it or shut up.

    VP: 8:27pm Smart, smart, smart. Bush just mentioned three Democrats who endorsed some sensible SS reforms, and which reforms they suggested. Not huge applause, but maybe enough. Powerful politicking there.

    CQ: 8:30 - Good for the President -- he pointed out that federal employees already have privatization.

    VP: 8:33pm So, no selling kidneys of aborted fetuses to gay couples. Or did I conflate a few things?

    PL: 8:37--The thing I always hate about these speeches is how they reveal the obsolescence of the concept of limited government. It's one damn program after another.

    PL: 8:48--A few years ago it was the Axis of Evil. Now it's Syria. Iran, too. And finally: a message for the Iranian people. "As you stand for your own liberty, America stands with you." I've never understood why we don't do more of this.

    PL: 8:56--The stuff on the benefits of Iraqi freedom is powerful. Back to back shots of Hillary and John Kerry applauding, but not looking happy. Kerry looks sick, too.

    CQ: 8:58 - Sgt. Bill Norwood's parents get hugs and handshakes, and it's not easy to type through this ...

    VP: 9:00pm If you're not tearing up a little right now, you're not watching. Again, words fail. Back in 90 seconds.

    CQ: 9:01 - A terrific and inspiring finish to one of George Bush's best policy speeches

    Captain's Quarters, PowerLine and VodkaPundit

    MemeWatch: The Case of the Moving Goalposts



    Click here for AmazonI'm waiting for the next "reasons Iraq will fail" meme to emanate from the mainstream media. A couple of candidates are emerging:

    1) A successful election won't stop the insurgency
    2) The Iraqi leadership will create a theocracy
    3) The insurgency will win and Iraq will become Lebanon

    Let's check out the track record of the MSM and the International World Community (IWC), with a major hat tip to New Sisyphus:

    The ICW said that the President could not possibly transfer power to an interim Iraqi government in June. They were wrong.

    * April 2004: International Doubt on Iraq Transfer of Power Deadline ("Annan Questions Iraq Self-Rule Deadline")


    The ICW said that the President could not possibly succeed in getting the parties in Iraq to agree to a mutually-acceptable framework for that interim government. They were wrong.

    * May 2004: Iraq's Post-Handover Worries (BBC, Global Policy, ...)


    The ICW said that getting people registered to vote by Jan. 30 was unrealistic. They were wrong.

    * January 2005: Calls to postpone Iraqi elections (List: ABC, USA Today, CBC, ...)


    And the ICW said that the Insurgents were winning and had the Sunni areas of the country so terrified that even if an election were held, it would have no validity. They were wrong.

    * January 2005: Voter turnout won't be enough to legitimize elections (BBC, Sydney Morning Herald)


    Maybe the MSM and the ICW will get one right someday, but I wouldn't hold my breath. Unless I was being driven around on Martha's Vineyard by Teddy Jo Kennedy.

    Tuesday, February 01, 2005

    Bloodsport: Humiliating the Mainstream Media



    Click here for AmazonClick here for Amazon
    Just when you thought the MSM couldn't possibly do any more damage to itself... in their zeal to find something, anything, with which to humiliate the President, AP and CNN are reporting that a US soldier has been captured by insurgent forces. Ooops, make that... a GI Joe doll has been captured. By fake insurgents. Holding a tiny, plastic M-16 rifle. With a backdrop composed of something that suspiciously resembles clip-art.

    What do we get from the MSM? The proud traditions of Murrow, Cronkite and Rather? The legacy of careful news-gathering, analysis, editing and publishing? The crack investigative journalists, vetting every lead and running down every angle?

    No, we get "fake, but accurate" memos and a freaking GI Joe Doll being held hostage in a toy store in Sheboygan. You know, it's not just the bloggers that are better news sources than the MSM these days. It's about anyone with a lick of common sense.

    Taranto: "A group calling itself the Al Mujahedin Brigade claimed Tuesday it captured a U.S. soldier in Iraq and threatened to behead him unless prisoners are released," CNN reports from Baghdad. But some have raised doubts about the authenticity of a photo posted on an Islamist Web site:

    In the photograph, the assault rifle--either an M-16 or an M-4--is pointed at the man's head, said CNN military analyst James Marks.

    Marks, a retired Army general, said he has several questions about the photograph's authenticity.

    A flak jacket the man is wearing in the picture has an unfamiliar kind of piping or trim along its edges, Marks said. The man's open-legged pants, as opposed to gathered hems, seem odd, he said.

    Marks also questioned what appeared to be camouflage paint on the man's face. "We have not used camo paint with conventional forces serving in Iraq," Marks said.


    Based on the photos the Drudge Report has uncovered, we'd say this looks like the work of the archterrorist Muhammad al-Sluggo.


    Click here for AmazonYou read that last part right... in another shocking development, Mr. Bill also appears to have been taken hostage.

    Bloodsport: Humiliating the Mainstream Media

    Update: Rumor has it that the Senior Bloviating Moonbat from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Teddy Jo Kennedy, issued a statement *hic* condemning the capture of "Joe". He also promised to use every available means to convince the president to withdraw US troops from Iraq, within the next 30 days, in order to secure Joe's release.

    Click here for AmazonStop the presses, we have a Second Update: the AP and Al Jazeera are reporting that a US operative may have captured Osama Bin Laden. This grainy photograph is the only evidence thus far, but both AP and AJ are running with the story.

    Third Update: One astute reader indicates that this news is exceedingly bad: it means Al Qaeda has linked up with C.O.B.R.A.!

    Fisking Bill Moyers



    Click here for AmazonEnjoy this vicious fisking of Bill Moyers by the brilliant James Lileks in the bleat. Based upon his most recent column, I fear Moyers will soon strip naked, run to the zoo, and join a family of sea otters to become "one" with the environment. If you happen to visit, please don't feed the Moyers.

    “For the first time in our history, ideology and theology hold a monopoly of power. What that means for the environment is frightening.”

    Well, it depends on your perspective. We all remember how 270,000 people were killed in a day when the environment demonstrated that it had a monopoly of power over plate tectonics.

    Below the words, a picture of cracked parched earth, which had once no doubt been green & verdant farmland before the Right Rev. Bush got out his joystick and sent his 900 foot tall Jesus robot to blast the crops with his death-beam laser eyes.

    Did I mention that the shadow of a cross falls across the parched land?

    ...It contains the usual terrors to come, and provides copious succor for those who believe the earth is doomed. (Sometimes I think these people would be annoyed if Jesus did return, because it would play hell with their fundraising. Jesus would have to hold a press conference: yes, the whales are coming to heaven. Most of the primates, too. All dogs. Mice? No. Look, I’m sorry, but no.) On one hand, it’s annoying, because articles like this make id difficult sometimes to have reasonable conversations about the necessary issues of environmental protection, because you don’t know if you’re dealing with someone who secretly thinks everyone who bought a “Left Behind” novel goes to bed chortling over the thought of a turtle strangled by a six-pack ring...


    Lileks: Fisking Bill Moyers

    Sun-Times: What if Bush has been right about Iraq all along?



    Click here for AmazonIn this era of unadulterated partisan politics, one of the rarest commodities is intellectual honesty.

    When Limbaugh, for example, harshly criticizes the spending and immigration policies of the Bush administration, he deserved credit because he is doing the right thing. When those on the left point out the ridiculous tax-breaks and boondoggles that result in only tiny improvements in fuel economy by Detroit, they are doing the right thing.

    On the other side of the aisle, Mark Brown, the liberal, anti-war columnist of the Chicago Sun-Times, is giving voice to what many on the left must be feeling. Kudos to Mr. Brown and others on the left who are recognizing what the much-maligned team of Bush, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz realized long ago:

    Suppressing terrorism requires a policy that removes authoritarian governments, empowers people, and spreads liberty. Anything else is simply short-term thinking packaged at best, precariously, and at worst, fatally, as a "solution".

    It's as big an idea, if not bigger, than Reagan's arms buildup that bankrupted the Soviet Union without firing a shot. History will record whether the risk was worth the lives and expenditure. But those who say that we are not safer than we were on September 12, 2001 are fooling themselves. And they can't be called intellectually honest.

    Maybe you're like me and have opposed the Iraq war since before the shooting started...

    ...By now, you might have even voted against George Bush -- a second time -- to register your disapproval.

    But after watching Sunday's election in Iraq and seeing the first clear sign that freedom really may mean something to the Iraqi people, you have to be asking yourself: What if it turns out Bush was right, and we were wrong?

    ...Maybe the United States really can establish a peaceable democratic government in Iraq, and if so, that would be worth something.

    Would it be worth all the money we've spent? Certainly.

    Would it be worth all the lives that have been lost? That's the more difficult question, and while I reserve judgment on that score until such a day arrives, it seems probable that history would answer yes to that as well...


    Sun-Times: What if Bush has been right about Iraq all along?

    Brave, Brave Sir Harry Reid



    Click here for AmazonHugh Hewitt has this delightful snippet on Harry Reid, who combines the wisdom of Barbara Boxer with the backbone of Teddy Kennedy:

    Harry Reid, visionary: "But most of all, we need an exit strategy so that we know what victory is and how we can get there." Actually, most of all what we need is an end to the threat of Islamist terror against the United States and the rest of the world, a far-off goal that requires the resolve and patience that Rid and his party utterly lack. The run-away caucus remains fundamentally irresponsible in the face of the threat.


    Hugh Hewitt: Brave, brave sir Harry Reid

    Prager: The Worth of the Left



    Click here for AmazonIt took a Polish rescuer of Jews in the Holocaust, cited this week 60 years after the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration and death camp, to best describe those people who cannot or refuse to know the difference between good and evil. They are "worth nothing."

    ...Since the 1960s, with few exceptions, on the greatest questions of good and evil, the Left has either been neutral toward or actively supported evil. The Left could not identify communism as evil; has been neutral toward or actually supported the anti-democratic pro-terrorist Palestinians against the liberal democracy called Israel; and has found it impossible to support the war for democracy and against an Arab/Muslim enemy in Iraq as evil as any fascist the Left ever claimed to hate.

    There were intellectually and morally honest arguments against going to war in Iraq. But once the war began, a moral person could not oppose it. No moral person could hope for, let alone act on behalf of, a victory for the Arab/Islamic fascists....

    It brings me no pleasure to describe opponents of the Iraqi war as "worth nothing." I know otherwise fine, decent people who oppose the war. So I sincerely apologize for the insult.

    ...That most Democratic Party leaders, union leaders, gay leaders, feminists, professors, editorial writers and news reporters have called for an American withdrawal and labeled this most moral of wars "immoral" is a permanent stain on their reputations.

    ...Leftists do so for the same reason they admired Ho Chi Minh and Mao Tse-tung and condemned American arms as the greatest threat to world peace during and after the Cold War. The Left "does not know the difference between good and evil." And that is why it is worth nothing.


    Dennis Prager: The Worth of the Left

    Monday, January 31, 2005

    The Prevaricator



    Click here for AmazonI just noticed that Captain Ed recognized something important that had been floating about the comments section of several blogs since John Kerry's appearance on Meet the Press. No, not the hilarious hijinx involving the CIA man and the magic hat (although both were mentioned... seriously). Just consider the following snippet of transcript:

    MR. RUSSERT: And you have a hat that the CIA agent gave you?

    SEN. KERRY: I still have the hat that he gave me, and I hope the guy would come out of the woodwork and say, "I'm the guy who went up with John Kerry. We delivered weapons to the Khmer Rouge on the coastline of Cambodia [emphasis mine]." We went out of Ha Tien, which is right in Vietnam. We went north up into the border. And I have some photographs of that, and that's what we did. So, you know, the two were jumbled together, but we were on the Cambodian border on Christmas Eve, absolutely.


    Ed points out that the Khmer Rouger were Cambodian Communists that devastated the country after the US pulled out:

    Why Kerry would think that we ran weapons to the Communists in Cambodia while battling them in Viet Nam is beyond me. It's apparent that he's making this story up as he goes along. Every time he's asked about Christmas in Cambodia, he changes the story. This time, he came up with a name that fits with the subject matter, but he's so clueless that he either didn't know or couldn't remember exactly what the Khmer Rouge were.

    It's yet another marker of the dishonesty we've come to expect from the junior senator from Massachusetts. He won't sign the Form 180, either, even with his promise to do so in the same interview. His prevarication has become pathological.


    You heard that right. At the end of the program, Kerry promised aaaagain to sign his Form 180 so that all of his records could be released. Don't hold your breath. We've got a better chance of seeing Dennis Rodman as a Supreme Court Justice.

    CQ: The Prevaricator

    This is al-Qa'eda Rule 18...



    Click here for AmazonThose who work themselves into a tizzy about alleged torture at Gitmo need a bit of education. Specifically, they need to acquaint themselves with the Al Qaeda training manual's "Rule 18": claim you were tortured. A lap dance is many things, but I've never heard it called torture before. The Boys from Brazil must be chortling into their soup about now. They knew what torture was.

    The men's claim that they were tortured at Guantanamo should also be set in the context of the al-Qa'eda training manual discovered during a raid in Manchester a couple of years ago. Lesson 18 of that manual, whose authenticity has not been questioned, emphatically states, under the heading "Prison and Detention Centres", that, when arrested, members of al-Qa'eda "must insist on proving that torture was inflicted on them by state security investigators. [They must] complain to the court of mistreatment while in prison". That is not, of course, proof that the Britons were not tortured in Guantanamo. But it ought to encourage some doubts about uncritically accepting that they were – which seems to be the attitude adopted by most of the media.


    The Telegraph: This is al-Qa'eda Rule 18: 'You must claim you were tortured'

    The New Cadillac DTS Presidential Limousine



    Click here for AmazonThe invaluable AutoSpies site points us to the new Cadillac DTS Presidential Limousine, a 2006 model that was hand-crafted for the President. It debuted on Inauguration day. Note the thickness of the windows and doors. It looks more like a bank vault than a vehicle... and, in this day and age, it should.

    With a new design and unique construction under the skin, the new Cadillac DTS limousine is handcrafted and dressed in a jet-black clearcoat finish. The vehicle is a considerably longer, wider and taller version of the production model that becomes available later this year. To maintain national security, the limousines are equipped with state-of-the-art protection and communication systems.

    The vehicle interior boasts six-passenger seating with comfort and visibility for all occupants. A rear seat executive package features a concealed, foldaway desktop that can be deployed when conducting affairs of state. The rear seats have an adjustable reclining feature along with the adaptive seat system, which senses the position of the occupant in the seat and automatically adjusts the cushion for added comfort. Moreover, rear seat passengers can enjoy their own premium sound system complete with a 10-disc CD changer. Wood accents, rich blue leather and cloth complete the executive interior.

    An embroidered presidential seal is positioned in the center of the rear seat back panel, as well as on each rear door trim panel. Presidential seals are also affixed to the exterior rear doors. The U.S. flag is placed on the right front fender, and the presidential standard is located on the left front fender when the president travels in the vehicle. Flush-mounted High Intensity Discharged (HID) spotlights illuminate the flags at night.


    AutoSpies: The New Cadillac DTS Presidential Limousine

    PoliPundit's Social Security Quote of the Day



    Click here for AmazonHypocrisy, as defined by Jayson at PoliPundit:

    Today, Social Security is strong. But by 2013, payroll taxes will no longer be sufficient to cover monthly payments. And by 2032, the trust fund will be exhausted, and Social Security will be unable to pay out the full benefits older Americans have been promised.

    The best way to keep Social Security a rock-solid guarantee is not to make drastic cuts in benefits; not to raise payroll tax rates; and not to drain resources from Social Security in the name of saving it...

    Specifically, I propose that we commit 60 percent of the budget surplus for the next 15 years to Social Security, investing a small portion in the private sector just as any private or state government pension would do. This will earn a higher return and keep Social Security sound for 55 years.


    President Bill Clinton: Statement on Social Security (January 19, 1999)

    Steyn



    Click here for AmazonUhmmm, as New Sisyphus says, it's pretty much always appropriate to prefix "the great" when referring to Mark Steyn. Read -- and savor -- the whole thing.

    The IMF noted in November that the Iraqi economy is already outperforming all its Arab neighbors.

    You might not have gained that impression from watching CNN or reading the Los Angeles Times. The Western press are all holed up in the same part of Baghdad, and the insurgents very conveniently set off bombs visible from their hotel windows in perfect synchronization with the U.S. TV news cycle. But, if they could look beyond the plumes of smoke, they'd see that Iraq's going to be better than OK, that it will be the economic powerhouse of the region, and that the various small nods toward democracy going on in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan and elsewhere suggest that the Arab world has figured out what the foreign policy ''realists'' haven't: that the trend is in the Bush direction...


    Mark Steyn: Iraq is going to be just fine

    Sunday, January 30, 2005

    Election Day



    Click here for AmazonIt's 7:20 AM ET, with polling in Iraq scheduled for about another two hours. Estimates indicate that 72% of the electorate turned out to vote. Turnout was heavy even in the so-called "triangle of death", where Sunnis and Shiites reside. There are about 5,200 polling stations. Of these, about nine were attacked on Sunday with no catastrophic losses. In other words, about one-fifth of one percent.

    By any measure, the vote is proceeding swimmingly. So, all that being said, let's see how the MSM is covering the vote:

    ABC News:

    Iraqis Defy Attacks to Cast Historic Votes
    Iraqis danced and clapped with joy Sunday as they voted in their country's first free election in a half-century, defying insurgents who launched eight deadly suicide bombings and mortar strikes
    • Iraq Election too Dangerous for Monitors

    CBS News:

    Bombs On Iraq's Election Day
    Ninety minutes after voting began in Iraq, violence including bombs claimed at least 31 lives, as rebels made good on their threats to disrupt the nation's first free elections in 50 years. "Steady" voter turnout is reported in many areas.
    • Interactive:Iraq Votes

    CNN:

    Bombers target Iraqi voters, polling stations
    A string of attacks, some targeting lines of voters waiting to cast ballots in Iraq's first free elections in half a century, killed at least 16 people Sunday and injured scores more. Turnout was sporadic, yet in some parts of the country polling stations were packed with Iraqis waiting to vote, many of them for the first time in their lives
    • Fear and defiance | Rocket Attack
    • Iraqis brave bombs to vote

    FoxNews:

    A New Dawn of Democracy
    Iraqis wait to enter polling station in Basra.
    • Nine homicide bombings and mortar strikes kill at least 31
    • Despite violence, eager Iraqis head to polls to vote in country's first free election in 50 years

    MSNBC:

    Voting amid violence
    Turnout picks up for critical Iraq election, but insurgents launch deadly attacks.
    • Newsweek: Why election won’t stop insurgency
    • WP: No timetable for U.S. troop withdrawal

    Hey, MSNBC: why not rig a truck to blow up, Dateline-style, in front of a polling station and then snap some photos of bloody ballots?

    I suppose the age-old canard, "if it bleeds, it leads" will always apply to the MSM. But it would be nice if, a few days down the road, at least one of the bigs (besides Fox) had the intellectual honesty -- and courage -- to call a success a success.

    The history books will eventually record whether a democratic Iraq succeeded or not. Whether a democratic Iraq dampened terror in the region. But let it never be said that President George W. Bush was not courageous and principled in sticking up for his beliefs that the Iraqi people needed to be freed and that despotism bred terror.

    My belief is that history will look upon the President and this era kindly, Teddy Jo Kopechne and rest of the left bank, anti-American nay-sayers notwithstanding.

    Update: Mohammed and Omar post the following inspiring, emotional entry on Iraq the Model...

    I still recall the first group of comments that came to this blog 14 months ago when many of the readers asked "The Model?"… "Model for what?" Take a look today to meet the model of courage and human desire to achieve freedom; people walking across the fire to cast their votes.

    Could any model match this one!? Could any bravery match the Iraqis'!? Let the remaining tyrants of the world learn the lesson from this day.

    The media is reporting only explosions and suicide attacks that killed and injured many Iraqis s far but this hasn't stopped the Iraqis from marching towards their voting stations with more determination. Iraqis have truly raced the sun.

    I walked forward to my station, cast my vote and then headed to the box, where I wanted to stand as long as I could, then I moved to mark my finger with ink, I dipped it deep as if I was poking the eyes of all the world's tyrants.
    I put the paper in the box and with it, there were tears that I couldn't hold; I was trembling with joy and I felt like I wanted to hug the box but the supervisor smiled at me and said "brother, would you please move ahead, the people are waiting for their turn".

    Yes brothers, proceed and fill the box!

    Saturday, January 29, 2005

    The Largest Man-Made Explosion Prior to Hiroshima



    Click here for AmazonIt was December 6, 1917, a bright, crystal clear day in Halifax, Nova Scotia. As a port city, Halifax was a bustling hive of activity. Troop ships, supply vessels and other vehicles were engaged in the commerce of World War I.

    Near eight in the morning, the Belgian supply ship Imo   headed out of the harbor. At the same time, the French vessel Mont Blanc   nosed its way into the harbor, preparing to join up with a convoy to cross the Atlantic.

    In the Mont Blanc's   hold, and even laid on its deck due to lack of space, were tons of ammunition and explosives: benzol, artillery ammo, gun cotton, pitric acid -- a building block of explosives -- and over 400,000 pounds of TNT.

    A series of navigational and signalling errors resulted in the Imo   crossing directly in front of the Mont Blanc  . The former struck the latter, missing the TNT, but creating an immense gash in the stores of benzol on deck. The resulting sparks of the collision set the stage for catastrophe.

    The crew of the Mont Blanc   understood instantly that they needed to evacuate. They abandoned ship using the lifeboats, and rowed full bore for Dartmouth while their ship burned. Their screamed warnings were either not heard or ignored.

    The Mont Blanc   careened aimlessly past a pier and set it afire. The Halifax Fire Department answered the call and began connecting their equipment to the nearest hydrant when the flaming ship disappeared. A white flash -- the largest man-made explosion prior to the nuclear age -- turned the harbor into an inferno of biblical proportions.

    More than 1,900 people were killed instantly and almost 10,000 were injured. 325 acres of land were destroyed and any remaining structures simply burned. The Mont Blanc   was pulverized: one if its cannons landed more than three miles away while a piece of its anchor, which weighed over 1,000 pounds, sailed two miles in the opposite direction. The shock wave was felt over 250 miles away and windows shattered as far as 50 miles from the explosion.

    Unfortunately, about twenty minutes elapsed between the inital collision and the devastating explosion. This was enough time for many people, including school children, to rush to the harbor to view the spectacle of the burning vessel. The glass launched by the explosion caused eye injuries to about 1,000 people...

    The Halifax explosion

    Book Review: Flyboys


    A stunning tale of barbarism, courage and loyalty



    Click here for AmazonIn a followup to Flags of our Fathers, James Bradley describes his detective work in determining what happened to nine airmen shot down over the island of Chichi Jima during World War II. One was easy: he was George Herbert Walker Bush, 41st President of the United States. The other eight were MIA. Starting with recently declassified records from a military trial of Japanese officers on Chichi Jima, his discoveries are both tragic and inspiring. In fact, these true stories of brutality, courage and honor are sometimes almost beyond belief.

    Rather than paint a single "snapshot" of the air war over the island near the end of World War II, Bradley tries to look at the big picture. His history lesson is concise, yet insightful. The brutal treatment of native Americans and Mexicans during early American expansionism... Commodore Perry's warships and the opening of international relations with Japan... the Russo-Japanese war that set the stage for World War II... the corruption of the Samurai ideal and the egregious Japanese atrocities in China... all are covered in wide-ranging and learned prose.

    Other reviewers have complained about overly harsh treatment of US involvement with native Americans, Commodore Perry's mission, and other alleged "political" agendas. Speaking as an avowed conservative, I found nothing obvious that skewed history either way. War is a brutal business and early Americans were frequently at war. We cannot pretend otherwise.

    The book is crammed full of interesting, historic details: American arms accounted for only a third of Japanese troop fatalities during World War II - lack of Japanese supply planning and poor strategy accounted for the remainder. The religious zeal with which Japanese soldiers were inculcated with the "no surrender" philosophy resulted in a brutish and barbaric form of war: "At Kwajalein, the Japanse garrison lost 4,938, with only 79 taken prisoner, a fatality rate of 98.4 percent."

    The result was a perceived need on the part of American military planners to devastate the Japanese homeland, knowing that surrender was untenable. To put this in perspective, D-Day required 175,000 invading troops. 7,000,000 American troops were in the Pacific by 1945 preparing for Operation Olympic, the first phase of the invasion.

    A War Department report concluded that, "defeating Japan would cost [them] five to ten million deaths and the United States between 1.7 and 4 million casualties, including 400,000 to 600,000 fatalities." Postwar analysis of Japanese homeland defenses indicate that Allied planners actually underestimated these casualty rates. Put in these terms, the fire-bombings and atomic attacks seem almost humane in that the corrupt Japanse military government was forced to succumb before millions of more lives were snuffed out.

    This is a stunning book that paints a picture of almost unbelievable courage, honor and loyalty. All the while, it teaches a history lesson that most never hear about in school. Five stars, without question.

    Amazon: Flyboys

    Thank you, Hollywood!



    Click here for AmazonLet's all give a big hand to Michael Moore, Alec Baldwin, Whoopi, and all the other members of the Hollywood Marxist Moonbats (Hat tip: LGF)....

    ...a billboard blitz “thanking” Hollywood for the reelection of President Bush will be unveiled early next week.

    The advertisements feature the faces of liberal Hollywood icons Michael Moore, Whoopi Goldberg, Ben Affleck, Martin Sheen, Chevy Chase, Barbara Streisand, and Sean Penn, and offer thanks to Hollywood their help getting President Bush reelected.

    Two versions of the billboard were created, both “thanking” Hollywood — the first for “4 more years” and the second for “W. Still President.”


    Thank you, Hollywood!

    Friday, January 28, 2005

    Teddy Jo: Cheering for the Terrorists



    Click here for AmazonTaranto is at it again, laying waste to Teddy Jo Kennedy in a manner reminiscent of Genghis Kahn. Teddy Jo, possessed of a miniaturized intellect when compared to his brother Jack, shocked many observers with one of the most anti-American statements in recent memory. But that's no surprise for the Senior Bloviating Moonbat from Massachusetts, whose decades-long track record of failed policies will leave skid marks, but not any sort of legacy.

    John F. Kennedy's... 1961 Inaugural Address:

    Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge--and more.


    Kennedy's brother Ted... is best known for driving off a bridge and leaving a young woman to drown. His attitude toward America's role in the world is the opposite of his brother's; it's best summed up as an inversion of FDR: We have nothing to offer but fear itself. Here he is yesterday at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies:

    The war in Iraq has become a war against the American occupation. . . . The U.S. military presence has become part of the problem, not part of the solution. . . . The first step is to confront our own mistakes. . . . No matter how many times the Administration denies it, there is no question they misled the nation and led us into a quagmire in Iraq. . . . As in Vietnam, truth was the first casualty of this war. . . . As a result of our actions in Iraq, our respect and credibility around the world have reached all-time lows. . . . Never in our history has there been a more powerful, more painful example of the saying that those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it. . .


    ...A succcessful election in Iraq will be a triumph for the Bush doctrine and the strongest rebuke yet to those Democrats who learned from Vietnam that America is a force for ill in the world. Ted Kennedy is, as The Wall Street Journal puts it today, "cheerleading for America to fail" because his ideology leaves him unfit to cope with American success. If he has his way, democracy in Iraq will suffer the same fate as Mary Jo Kopechne.


    James Taranto: Cheering for the Terrorists