tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post2040838729890252461..comments2024-03-29T03:20:17.451-04:00Comments on Doug Ross @ Journal: Must-See Proof: Corrupt Media, Corrupt PollsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-81495949639047956512012-09-17T10:47:37.844-04:002012-09-17T10:47:37.844-04:00This post is exactly what we need to see. It illus...This post is exactly what we need to see. It illustrates the media skew. I believe that independents ARE more for Romney, because of Twitter experience I had over the weekend<br /><br />http://thunderlightningrain.blogspot.com/2012/09/dont-trust-polls.htmlguitartom47https://www.blogger.com/profile/06467942507432735219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-31695864514886206982012-09-16T21:50:41.618-04:002012-09-16T21:50:41.618-04:00My understanding is Rasmussen uses a rolling avera...My understanding is Rasmussen uses a rolling average of the previous three months party affiliation which is +1 R not +3. Last month was +3 R but he does a rolling average just like iwth his daily pols.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-29861554382102164922012-09-16T19:17:31.235-04:002012-09-16T19:17:31.235-04:00The graph should have a slope=1 line passing throu...The graph should have a slope=1 line passing through the origin to show the actual baseline when the sample is biased. Anything below the line (in this case) would represent Romney being ahead. All the points are below the lineBrett_McShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18395081638073964244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-51216536310294040212012-09-16T14:04:18.791-04:002012-09-16T14:04:18.791-04:00suek said...
what does SCOAMF stand for? 4:04 PM v...<em>suek said...<br />what does SCOAMF stand for? 4:04 PM</em> vernssE<br /><br />Stuttering Clusterf##k of a Miserable Failure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-59476835984645909432012-09-16T10:22:34.035-04:002012-09-16T10:22:34.035-04:00Suek, if your question is serious, it stands for S...Suek, if your question is serious, it stands for STUTTRING CLUSTERFARK OF A MISERABLE FAILURE or word to that effect. k6whphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14459579212118994056noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-84201297646186879662012-09-15T18:54:36.875-04:002012-09-15T18:54:36.875-04:00I've always felt that it is going to be 90%/10...I've always felt that it is going to be 90%/10% D/R. I don't know why Dem Corppppss only give D an 11% advantage. I've always thought, based on the 2010 elections, that D would out vote R by 9:1. I think it should be Obama 90%/Romney 10%. No wait, Obama 99%/Romney 1%. This is after consulting with E. Anglia and Penn St.Maudie N Mandevillehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07608333522668477953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-75575385382228450522012-09-15T17:58:15.206-04:002012-09-15T17:58:15.206-04:00The same affect was used to negate the bounce from...The same affect was used to negate the bounce from the Republican convention and boost the bounce from the Democrap freakfest.JimKnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-41243905300554995902012-09-15T17:21:32.202-04:002012-09-15T17:21:32.202-04:00Stuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failureStuttering clusterf*ck of a miserable failureAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-84956018250796804662012-09-15T17:16:29.822-04:002012-09-15T17:16:29.822-04:00Thank-you, I have asked for that visual at HotAir ...Thank-you, I have asked for that visual at HotAir for a long timeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-46794903271282613902012-09-15T16:04:26.703-04:002012-09-15T16:04:26.703-04:00what does SCOAMF stand for?what does SCOAMF stand for?sueknoreply@blogger.com