tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post316792456039113074..comments2024-03-28T17:03:56.038-04:00Comments on Doug Ross @ Journal: SH'YEAH: Totally Non-Partisan New York Times Helpfully Offers to Rewrite Second AmendmentUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-85931884132619448682018-03-30T11:24:34.433-04:002018-03-30T11:24:34.433-04:00Step 1: No real sportsman needs a semi-auto with a...Step 1: No real sportsman needs a semi-auto with a 30 rd. mag.<br /><br />Step 2: No real sportsman needs a bolt action with a scope.<br /><br />Step 3: No real sportsman needs any more than a single shot rifle.<br /><br />Step 4: Killing animals is evil, ban hunting and along with it, the need to own a gun.Whoopiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15662821847774702856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-7603894608379981272018-03-30T10:35:05.882-04:002018-03-30T10:35:05.882-04:00Now all we need is for five justices on the Suprem...Now all we need is for five justices on the Supreme Court to ratify this rewrite as required by Article 22, Section я(37a) of the US Constitution, amiright New York Times?<br /><br />Just kidding. You know you can try to rewrite (ie, abrogate) any amendment in the Constitution, it has been done. The problem here is you need the consent of two thirds of the states, many of whom loathe and despise everything the NY Times stands for.<br /><br />But hey, maybe if you browbeat these people EVEN MORE, they'll stop thinking that you consider them subhuman and that you're trying to take away all their rights. Maybe they'll willingly submit to being a degraded caste of second class citizens. Worth a tryAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-84552105623778859532018-03-30T09:36:46.834-04:002018-03-30T09:36:46.834-04:00The Declaration of Independence is the foundationa...The Declaration of Independence is the foundational authority for US Law. It states in part: "...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ..."<br /><br />The focus of the Second was and remains recognizing the pre-existing right of The People to keep and bear arms in order to resist such Despotism and to exercise their duty to throw off such Government. All other uses of arms implied by the Second Amendment are secondary to this purpose. <br /><br />With this in mind, it must go without saying that giving government the power to nullify this right for any persons who would use their arms to resist a tyrannous government is a roundabout way of destroying the proper relationship between the citizen and government.<br /><br />--theBuckWheat<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-47064362596404475292018-03-30T08:20:16.254-04:002018-03-30T08:20:16.254-04:00NYT evidently doesn't consider or value the ri...NYT evidently doesn't consider or value the right to self-defense and the right to defend one's family and property with firearms.Sibylhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17992846006169408498noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-46931200745833875362018-03-30T08:18:40.263-04:002018-03-30T08:18:40.263-04:00Now do the 1st amendment.
This is the exact reaso...Now do the 1st amendment.<br /><br />This is the exact reason we have the 2a in the first place, for there will always be jackasses who believe a free state exists by mere accident.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6034478.post-9237130795700032652018-03-29T23:38:16.671-04:002018-03-29T23:38:16.671-04:00Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaLOL.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com