Line o' the Day: Giving white trash a bad name

 
Don Surber:

"Agents of Sen. Hillary Clinton are spreading the word in Democratic circles that she has scandalous information about her principal opponent for the party's presidential nomination, Sen. Barack Obama, but has decided not to use it..."

...The reality is that the Clintons are so dirty, so sweaty from the sewer that they are the last people in the nation who can sling mud... What possibly dirt can they have that is worse than their dirt?

Is Obama having affairs with staffers, groping widows or sending state troopers to procure women?

Has Obama lied under oath?

Has Obama taken money from agents of communist governments?

Is one of Obama's top fund-raisers a convicted felony and fugitive from justice?

Has Obama accepted money in exchange for presidential pardons?

Are Buddhist monks and nuns being used to launder campaign money from friends in Hollywood?

Has Obama dug up any 40-year-old affairs to leak to the press?

Is he hiding 3 million pages of public record from the public?

The problem with the Clintons is that they give white trash a bad name.

And that's the problem with Surber: he's so guarded and circumspect that it's hard to tell what he's driving at.

Oh, about the picture. I have no idea how that got in there.