Thursday, May 27, 2010

Obama counterterror adviser helpfully offers Koranic instruction to Muslim clerics: killing one million civilians isn't your religious duty, really

We're in the very best of hands.

FOXNews.com, May 27, 2010

Counterterror Adviser Defends Jihad as 'Legitimate Tenet of Islam'


The president's top counterterrorism adviser on Wednesday called jihad a "legitimate tenet of Islam," arguing that the term "jihadists" should not be used to describe America's enemies.

During a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, John Brennan described violent extremists as victims of "political, economic and social forces," but said that those plotting attacks on the United States should not be described in "religious terms."

He repeated the administration argument that the enemy is not "terrorism," because terrorism is a "tactic," and not terror, because terror is a "state of mind" -- though Brennan's title, deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism and homeland security, includes the word "terrorism" in it. But then Brennan said that the word "jihad" should not be applied either.

"Nor do we describe our enemy as 'jihadists' or 'Islamists' because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one's community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children," Brennan said...

...Brennan argued that it would be "counterproductive" for the United States to use the term, as it would "play into the false perception" that the "murderers" leading war against the West are doing so in the name of a "holy cause."

"Moreover, describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by Al Qaeda and its affiliates to justify terrorism -- that the United States is somehow at war against Islam," he said.

Of course, back in the pretty blue-green world we like to call Earth, Stratfor Research reports that yet another respected Islamic scholar has advised Muslims worldwide that -- wait for it... -- killing one million American women and children is their religious duty.

...In the May 23 al-Malahim interview (his first with AQAP), al-Awlaki not only said he was proud of the actions of [terrorists] Hasan and Abdulmutallab, whom he referred to as his students, but also encouraged other Muslims to follow the examples they set by their actions. When asked about the religious permissibility of an operation like Abdulmutallab’s, which could have killed innocent civilians, al-Awlaki told the interviewer that the term “civilian” was not really applicable to Islamic jurisprudence...

"...the American people in its entirety takes part in the war, because they elected this administration, and they finance this war.” In his final assessment, al-Awlaki said, “If the heroic mujahid brother Umar Farouk could have targeted hundreds of soldiers, that would have been wonderful. But we are talking about the realities of war,” meaning that in his final analysis, attacks against civilians were permissible under Islamic law. Indeed, he later noted, “Our unsettled account with America, in women and children alone, has exceeded one million. Those who would have been killed in the plane are a drop in the ocean.”

...While this line of logic is nearly identical to that historically put forth by Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the very significant difference is that al-Awlaki is a widely acknowledged Islamic scholar. He speaks with a religious authority that bin Laden and al-Zawahiri simply do not possess.

Brennan's incoherent remarks come on the heels of another first for a U.S. "intelligence" official. In a February speech, he referred to Jerusalem by its Arabic name, Al-Quds.

"In all my travels the city I have come to love most is al-Quds, Jerusalem, where three great faiths come together," Brennan said at an event co-sponsored by the White House Office of Public Engagement and the Islamic Center at New York University and the Islamic Law Students Association at NYU.

With leaders like this, who needs to worry about sleeper cells?


Hat tip: Dan from New York. Linked by: Michelle Malkin. Thanks!

2 comments:

  1. THANK YOU FOR THIS POST!!

    I always love reading your blog!!

    Common Cents
    http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:04 AM

    This imbecile also claims that athropogenic global warming is a MAJOR threat to national security. Does this idiot have a task force to protect us from the Klingons too? Our country is being run by malevolent children.

    ReplyDelete