Monday, October 03, 2011

Another success story for central planning: Fed rule will ban credit cards for many stay-at-home parents

Isn't it amazing how everything the Obama administration touches -- aside from our military and intelligence communities -- turns to crap?

A federal rule kicked in Saturday that will prevent many applicants from qualifying for new credit card accounts.

The Federal Reserve's rule told credit card companies that they no longer can consider household income when assessing the creditworthiness of an individual who applies for his or her own card. Under the rule, only an individual's own salary or other income -- rather than combined household income -- can be considered.

One major effect of the new regulation: Stay-at-home moms (or dads) without significant outside income no longer will be able to open their own credit card accounts -- and establish their own credit histories to build their credit scores. Compliance with the rule became mandatory Oct. 1, 2011.

"From an economic standpoint, this is a whopper," said Manisha Thakor, founder of the Women's Financial Literacy Initiative, a financial fellow at Wellesley College and a Houston-based financial analyst. "Not only will be harder to build a credit score, but this ruling is tantamount to assigning a zero dollar value to the work stay-at-home parents do day in and day out to keep households running."

...Previously, an individual member of a household could qualify for a credit card account by pointing to the combined income of several members of that household. For instance, in the case of a married couple, a stay-at-home wife without any independent income could qualify for and obtain a credit card under only her own name -- and establish her own credit history -- by pointing to the salary of her husband.

That no longer will be the case. Now, she must prove that she can make the payments with only her own resources, a nearly impossible hurdle for many homemakers to overcome.

"They're going to be stuck, really stuck," said Barbara Shapiro, a Boston-area registered investment adviser, vice president of the HMS Financial Group and a certified divorce financial analyst. "It makes these people completely unable to buy an airline ticket, rent a car or do anything that requires a credit card.

"We're becoming a cashless society," Shapiro said. "What are these people supposed to do?"

What indeed?

Maybe they can survive on hope, change, pink ponies and unicorn dreams.


Hat tip: Laughing Conservative.

5 comments:

  1. This is yet another small step for democrats, and another giant leap for progressives. If your goal is the destruction of the traditional family, then congratulations are in order.

    Exemption to this rule for same sex civil unions in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually, I think it was a severe miscalculation by the left. Their Keynesian model doesn't fit with this. But what does fit with this is the traditional family values of the bread winner holding the purse strings. Wives will no longer be able to secretly bury their family in debt. Two of my last gals tried that on me when I was living with them. My last engagement ended over it (though luckily for me anyway and for many reasons). She, by the way, now owes more than she and I make in two or three years (and drives a 20 year old truck, has no home, and is hitting retirement through disability). *shrug*

    No, I like this one. It's a keeper. It means the freeriders can't redistribute the breadmaker's earnings to themselves or their vices. If he wants to get a card with both their names, cool (let him try not to do so). If not, so be it. But either way he won't find out ten or twenty years down the road that she has gambled "their" savings away, or blown it on dresses or shoes or some other damn fool thing.

    No, this was not something Zero and kruw is for. I would say it is incompetence, but I think 'Sheriff Taylor' simply gave Barney a blank, with a dead primer to boot.

    3... 2... Now Ange! Oh Barney, I did it for your own good.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bones6:14 AM

    So whats the goal? Could it work out that the Husband, with a job, hires his wife to take care of the family? Then Obama can take credit for a million jobs created.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is bad news for my parrot and my dog. They always enjoyed the credit offers they got in the mail.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Bad...

    Bingo. Wives have to work. No more of that staying at home taking care of the kids stuff...

    ReplyDelete