And yet, the same kind of thing we see in the Fashion, which has presented an overt nasty demeanor towards many on the good side.
For example, it is truly ironic, to see Allahpundit discuss the hyperbole about Miller ducking the question about Mrs. Palin being qualified for the Presidency. The Fashion he presents is pure sophistry, implying the reason JOE might have not wanted to answer such a question was to appease Republicans who "hate" Sarah Palin. Huh? Does he have evidence of this absurdity? Politicians embrace anything which wins elections.
This is the type of ugly stereotyping, baseless garbage, generic portrayals the horrid Democratic Partisans often employ.
So now if one answers with some uncertainty about Mrs. Palin's qualifications for the POTUS position, they are going to be deemed a 'hater'?
That kind of sophistry, is exactly what we see ugly Democrats use today, trying to paint critics of the terrible Obama as "racist".
Allahpundit again shows a pathetic Fashionable offering, which is far from Conservative. It is regretful, but this is what is weakening the good side.
No one should blame Ms. Murkowski for foolishly overstaying her welcome, because she was poorly treated by the Tea Party Express, the Fashionable Conservatives, numerous Celebrity Pundits, the Palin Family, etc. (I remember the ugly emails, which clearly distorted the Murkowski record - or became overtly personal in manner).
Of course, predictably, the ugly hostility, (being far from Conservative), only created the backlash, another enemy, etc., when it wasn't necessary. One could only expect Ms. Murkowski to feel slighted and in a position free to muck up the works.
Perhaps another teachable moment, for future adventures in trying to defeat awful RINO moderates, and the painful nature of a reactionary Authoritarian Movement based on Identity.
Instead of claiming Murkowski was conspiring to steal an election, they could have reached out to her, and they could have run a more decent campaign from the get go - which encouraged Ms. Murkowski to remain on board with the good side. But the irrational negativity - pushing the most absurd led the way.
LOL !
ReplyDeleteIt is funny...
And yet, the same kind of thing we see in the Fashion, which has presented an overt nasty demeanor towards many on the good side.
For example, it is truly ironic, to see Allahpundit discuss the hyperbole about Miller ducking the question about Mrs. Palin being qualified for the Presidency. The Fashion he presents is pure sophistry, implying the reason JOE might have not wanted to answer such a question was to appease Republicans who "hate" Sarah Palin. Huh? Does he have evidence of this absurdity? Politicians embrace anything which wins elections.
This is the type of ugly stereotyping, baseless garbage, generic portrayals the horrid Democratic Partisans often employ.
So now if one answers with some uncertainty about Mrs. Palin's qualifications for the POTUS position, they are going to be deemed a 'hater'?
That kind of sophistry, is exactly what we see ugly Democrats use today, trying to paint critics of the terrible Obama as "racist".
Allahpundit again shows a pathetic Fashionable offering, which is far from Conservative. It is regretful, but this is what is weakening the good side.
No one should blame Ms. Murkowski for foolishly overstaying her welcome, because she was poorly treated by the Tea Party Express, the Fashionable Conservatives, numerous Celebrity Pundits, the Palin Family, etc. (I remember the ugly emails, which clearly distorted the Murkowski record - or became overtly personal in manner).
Of course, predictably, the ugly hostility, (being far from Conservative), only created the backlash, another enemy, etc., when it wasn't necessary. One could only expect Ms. Murkowski to feel slighted and in a position free to muck up the works.
Perhaps another teachable moment, for future adventures in trying to defeat awful RINO moderates, and the painful nature of a reactionary Authoritarian Movement based on Identity.
Instead of claiming Murkowski was conspiring to steal an election, they could have reached out to her, and they could have run a more decent campaign from the get go - which encouraged Ms. Murkowski to remain on board with the good side. But the irrational negativity - pushing the most absurd led the way.
We have no one to blame but ourselves.