The charts below are derived from The New York Times' real-time election feeds (e.g., here). They show "DNA-level" evidence of vote fraud that was systematically used to overcome massive Trump leads with "vote flips" to Biden.
The twin charts below depict the shifts in votes starting on election day. The X-axis is the date/time and the Y-axis represents the change in votes (positive values denote shifts for Trump, negative values represent shifts for Biden, in hundreds).
Notice the similarities in PA and GA? How the right sides of the graph show virtually no movement for Trump; and very predictable vote movements to Biden. How predictable?
You have to see the data to really understand the magnitude of the scam.
Below are excerpts of spreadsheets that show what was happening on the right side of each chart. Vote flips in the same-sized bundles (6,000 in PA and 4,800 in GA) were injected into the system to overcome Trump's lead in both states. You can click either image above to see all of the data.
The highlighted cells show where the vote counts -- stunningly obvious in retrospect -- were manipulated to benefit Biden.
Note the vote flips, represented by the highlighted cells, that occurred in both PA and GA. In PA, late vote flips in bundles of around 6,000 were clear anomalies to slowly overcome Trump's lead. In GA, the bundles were in 4,800 vote swaps.
Again, these are just excerpts. You can see the workbooks for yourself here: just click for Pennsylvania and Georgia.
Scroll down until you start hitting the highlighted cells.
Sorry, Democrats: this is what we call DNA-level statistical proof of fraud.
And there's a lot more where this came from. These are just the excerpts.
p.s., can someone who knows Sidney Powell or Joe DiGenova get this info to them?
Hat tip: BadBlue Uncensored News.
207 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 207 of 207Data explains the results but doesn't support a conspiracy theory..Volumes of mailed in ballots were likely the cause of the large influxes..Mail in ballot fraud,loose,lack of, and inconsistent id checks between the states,causing the fraud skeptism is a more plausible theory..
There may yet be a smoking gun here.
Even this junky NYT/Edison data raises other questions that have not been explored yet, and won't get explored as long as we're staring at mirages. For example here's something odd:
The interval dt between successive vote count updates is as long as one day, as short as a few seconds. (N=667)
The short intervals swing* either way: some for Biden, some for Trump. Actually more for Trump.
But not the long ones. No interval dt over 10 minutes (N=213) swings significantly for Trump.
Why?
An innocent explanation? (like "Mail-in ballots kept slowly trickling in, and they lean neutral or Biden")
Or foul play? (like "It took time for Dems to prepare more fakes")
This is partly an artifact: those darn "bundles" appear because of the imprecise source data. Still, why would even the artifacts have such a sharply uneven distribution over a 4-OOM range of dt?
Best regards, Steve
* swing(n)=dVBmax(n)-dVTmax(n)
sorry, but this analysis makes you look foolish (unless all you're after is the ad revenue on your site). if all you had was total votes + a percentage from NYT, then your noise is rounding. there's no vote switching.
suppose the following ACTUAL numbers:
T 2,997,000 out of 6,000,000: 49.95% (so it will be rounded to 50.0%, and you will think he really had 3,000,000)
B 2,996,999 out of 6,000,000: 49.949983% (so it will be rounded to 49.9%, and you will think he really had 2,994,000)
(and then the remaining to the 3rd party)
now a new batch comes in ... 1 vote for T, 3 for B.
T 2,997,001 out of 6,000,004 (49.949983% or 49.9% ... you think T now has 2,994,002 ... WTH they just stole 5998 from TRUMP!!!!)
B 2,997,002 out of 6,000,004 (49.950000% or 50.0% ... you think B now has 3,000,002 ... WTH they just gave 6002 to BIDEN!!!!)
So you ought to take this down. I think the more compelling thing to look into is why they were able to count 1.9M mail-in ballots on Wednesday ... but then took Thu/Fri/Sat to only count 700k more. why so slow? and were they working on manufacturing votes to get them over the hump?
@Forest Queen, I have to thank you for that information, it's not only the best info I've come across, it's the information I needed to just breathe,relax and wait patiently until January..
happy holidays to you and your family.
~Renese~
Isn't that also true for Australia or soemthing to that effect?
Tomorrow is the 112 th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic. Your god placed an iceberg in its path and took 1,500 people to their deaths. It’s also the 140th anniversary of the assassination of our greatest president. Why did your god not cause Booth’s pistol to misfire? You god is a figment of your imagination.
This is nothing new. Postal votes, since many states have allowed them to be counted up to ten days after Election Day, have always flipped a temporary Republican majority of mainly in-person voters, since Democrats hold at least a 3:1 ratio in postal votes - many of them fake. Dem-majority counties in countless states ignore the federal law mandating regular purging of voter rolls of people who are dead, have moved to another county or state, are felons prohibited from voting, are aliens, list their home address as a vacant lot, Macdonalds fast-food franchise, etc., or are non-existent. The WSJ estimates that three million of these ineligible voters receive postal ballots. As an example, N. Carolina, after being sued, removed 460,000 ineligible from its rolls. This fiddling about with graphs and similar irrelevant junk, instead of forcing every state to purge its voter rolls every two years, is why Republicans keep snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
Post a Comment