Top 10 Fun Facts From The Obama-Biden Weaponization Of Government Report

CTH: The House Subcommittee on the weaponization of government has issued a massive 17,000-page series of staff reports documenting the Obama/Biden weaponization of government.

Here are the top 10 most egregious or unlawful actions alleged against the Obama-Biden administration in the report from the House Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Government:

1. Collusion with Social Media: The administration allegedly coordinated with social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter to manipulate information flow and suppress dissent as early as the Arab Spring. [Editor's note: 2009!]

2. Domestic Propaganda: The signing of HR-5736 allowed the dissemination of U.S. government-produced propaganda domestically, which had previously been banned, effectively enabling government control over media narratives.

3. 
   
   Censorship Operations: The report claims that the DHS and other agencies engaged in systematic censorship operations during the COVID-19 pandemic, limiting access to alternative viewpoints and information.

4. Influence on Protests: Allegations suggest that the administration actively supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Libya via social media, using these platforms to organize protests against established governments.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: The establishment of direct communication lines between government entities (DHS, FBI) and major social media companies is viewed as a means for the government to control and influence public discourse.

6. Manipulation of Information: The report highlights efforts to label and categorize information as “mis-dis-mal information” to delegitimize opposing viewpoints and control the narrative.

7. Weaponization of Intelligence: The intelligence community is accused of being used as a tool for political purposes, undermining democratic institutions and processes.

8. Erosion of Free Speech: Officials reportedly expressed that free speech is a threat to governance, indicating a desire to restrict First Amendment rights to maintain control over public opinion.

9. Cover-Up Mechanism: Allegations assert that Biden was selected as the 2020 candidate to provide cover for the Obama administration’s previous actions, allowing continuity in controlling narratives.

10. Fear and Desperation among Officials: The report indicates that the loss of narrative control has led to fear among government officials, prompting discussions of preemptive pardons and a sense of desperation.

There would seem to be a lot of folks on the left side of the aisle at risk.

The political abuse of federal government agencies must end, through DOGE, criminal charges, or other creative means.

I asked AI about the possible crimes involved here:

1. First Amendment violations - Government coordination with private companies to suppress speech could violate constitutional protections

2. Smith-Mundt Act violations - Potential misuse of propaganda authorities that were meant for foreign audiences

3. Federal Records Act/FOIA violations - If government officials used private channels to conduct official business

4. Abuse of power/color of authority - Using government positions and influence to pressure private companies

5. Administrative Procedure Act violations - Government agencies potentially operating outside their statutory authority

6. Fourth Amendment issues - Government surveillance and data collection without proper warrants

7. Elections laws - If government resources were used to influence electoral outcomes

The misuse of government resources and authority to control information flow through informal pressure on private companies, rather than proper regulatory channels, is serious. 

It could implicate criminal and civil statutes -- including civil rights violations -- and abuse of power.

See CTH for the source links (four chapters)