No, "liberals" only support free speech when their pathetic little cocoons at Starbucks and Bed, Bath & Beyond aren't threatened.
Thank heavens for people like Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer and Geert Wilders, who still believe in legimate political discourse. Political, because the Religion o' Peace is a political system first and a religion second.
That's why there are so many misunderstanders of Islam like these two schmucks:
The drawing that won in #Garland pic.twitter.com/HXqVJlGdlc
— Hank Quinlan (@Quinlan_Hank) May 4, 2015Here's the real contest winner, brought to us by the eminently talented Bosch Fawstin.
1st place drawing at the #Garland #DrawMohammed event. Very offensive, so please don't retweet it whatever you do. pic.twitter.com/0wh12UtAmv
— Tactical Dissent (@TacticalDissent) May 4, 2015Free speech is free speech, "progressives".
Unless you feel like anyone threatens to kill you when they disagree with you is a legitimate form of dissent.
Schmucks.
Hat tip: BadBlue News.
1 comment:
"That they applaud because they know that Christians will turn the other cheek."
To be fair, Liberals applaud the "piss Christ" because they HATE Christians. If Christians did not turn the other cheek, like the Muslim terrorists in TX, and tried to murder the "artist", Liberals would be denouncing Christians and defending the guy who offended them.
They'd be pretending to support the 1st Amendment. You wouldn't hear a word about the "artist" being a provocateur, much less the leader of a "hate" group.
Remember - they have no principles, they're shameless, and don't care a bit if they epitomize hypocrisy. Its all about the agenda.
Post a Comment