Monday, July 24, 2017

SNOPES TAKEN HOSTAGE: Left-wing "fact-checker" reveals it has lost control of its website

At one point in the distant past of the Interwebs, Snopes.com was taken seriously as a leading de-bunker of urban myths.

As the years went by, its founders -- a once-married couple named David and Barbara Mikkelson -- decided to drift into political commentary. As their site grew, they hired an openly partisan, left-wing blogger named Kim Lacapria.

Lacapria had earlier declared herself "openly left-leaning" and very liberal. She has tarred conservatives as "teahadists" who "fear female agency".

After joining Snopes, Lacapria quickly found herself and the site embroiled in controversy as her various posts read like Democrat op-eds and not any sort of fact-checking.

The Mikkelsons themselves are an interesting pair. They divorced in 2014, but appear to be engaged in a vicious battle over their assets. One court document accuses David of "raiding the corporate business Bardav bank account for his personal use... [which] he expended upon himself and the prostitutes he hired."

Well, as you might expect from an organization this well-run...

...Snopes "is now in danger of closing its doors" and has been forced to hold a fundraising campaign (link intentionally omitted).

In the letter David Mikkelson wrote describing the reason for the campaign, he admits that the company has lost control of its own website and says it's being held "hostage" by a vendor it outsourced various services to.

That's a big deal. In fact, Mikkelson implies that the vendor could create, alter and delete any site contents it wants to. Thus far, he claims that hasn't happened.

Snopes.com, which began as a small one-person effort in 1994 and has since become one of the Internet’s oldest and most popular fact-checking sites, is in danger of closing its doors. So, for the first time in our history, we are turning to you, our readership, for help.

Since our inception, we have always been a self-sustaining site that provides a free service to the online world: we've had no sponsors, no outside investors or funding, and no source of revenue other than that provided by online advertising. Unfortunately, we have been cut off from our historic source of advertising income.

We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.

Our legal team is fighting hard for us, but, having been cut off from all revenue, we are facing the prospect of having no financial means to continue operating the site and paying our staff (not to mention covering our legal fees) in the meanwhile.

As misinformation has increasingly threatened democracies around the world (including our own), Snopes.com has stood in the forefront of fighting for truth and dispelling misinformation online...

The fact that Snopes says it has lost control of its site renders its already tenuous hold on the fact-checking business meaningless.

Snopes should be removed from any fact arbitration services from Facebook and Google until it can reclaim control of its site.

Meanwhile, those interested in all of the legal back-and-forth between the parties can grab some popcorn and enjoy.

Hat tip: BadBlue Real-Time News and Lou.
 

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am a rich and powerful Senator who has discovered the efficacy of personal grooming thanks to Norelco. David and Barbara recommended the personal grooming stick called the "selfie", so I can hook my OneBlade to it and shave my back as well as the nose, ears, and eyebrows. I am a liberated man, you'll find me on Snopes, Who am I?

Diogenes Sarcastica™ said...

Without Snopes, I won’t know whether I should refuse to accept anyone’s business card ever again because it could be soaked in a dangerous drug which will completely erase my memory and make me believe I'm Joan Crawford. And how will I ever know for sure whether those two cats living in my house these past 6 years are really not aliens from another planet deposited in my house for the sole purpose of spying on me and driving me insane?

Stoutcat said...

This is a very sad turn of events. Back in the 90s, when Snopes was just the Mikkelsons researching and debunking urban legends, it was a wonderful site. With the advent of LaCapria, it turned into something ugly, politically, although the non-political writing was still sound. Then everything seems to have gone completely off the rails. I'd gladly make a donation to them if they'd fire LaCapria and get back to debunking urban legends.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. This Lacapria person sounds satanic. Is pizza involved?

Anonymous said...

'Fact Check.org' is yet another phony left wing site whose main purpose seems to be bashing conservatives.