Tuesday, July 18, 2017

COVERING PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS? Call It What It Is. Welfare, Not Insurance.

By Rush Limbaugh

Can someonte tell me why should insurance companies have to cover people who got sick and didn’t have insurance and now want to get — why should they have to cover that?

Do you realize doing that raises everybody’s premiums? That isn’t even insurance. If we want to provide insurance for people, preexisting conditions, set up a separate entitlement called the preexisting conditions welfare plan. It isn’t insurance, and it raises everybody’s premiums. It’s what’s wrong with this.

Do not misunderstand me, please, folks. I am not opposed to people with preexisting conditions being treated. We are a compassionate country. But it isn’t insurance...

By the way, I think keeping your kids on your policy ’til their 26? I think that’s bogus too. But I happen to know people want it ’cause their kids can’t find jobs, thanks to Obama. Thanks to our economy, their kids are still living at home.

In the real world, by the time you’re 26, you start making choices about what you want based on what you can afford, and if you can’t afford what you want, you work harder to get what you need to be able to afford it. But that’s not how things are looked at anymore. But preexisting insurance isn’t insurance. People confuse health care with health insurance. The idea that our country is rotten or that something’s wrong with it because it will not insure people with preexisting conditions…? What is a preexisting condition? Somebody define that for me.

No, cancer by itself is not a preexisting condition. No, it’s not. Cancer without insurance is a preexisting condition. If you don’t have health insurance and all of a sudden you get cancer, and then want to buy health insurance, there’s no reasonable, intelligent insurance agent who would sell a policy. When your house catches fire and you don’t have homeowners and you call State Farm and say, “I want fire insurance!” “Why?” “My house is on fire!” They’d hang up on you. “Too bad!”

So if you had insurance and then you lose your job or your company fires you or whatever and your new policy doesn’t have it and then you get cancer, preexisting… If we as a society determine that we are going to treat people who do not have insurance, then we should do it, and we should call it something.

But to lump it in to health insurance is gonna distort the cost and the premiums. In fact, you want to know the dirty little secret about this? The way Obamacare did this… They had to fund preexisting conditions. If you were in that category they had… I forget what the name of it, but they were pools. I think “high-risk pools” is what they were calls. And you could sign up for access to the high-risk pools, and it was exclusively for people who had preexisting conditions. And you know what they found? The number of people who signed up, you could put in a thimble! The fact of the matter is, it’s a small percentage of the population.

It’s just like the whole purpose of Obamacare in the first place. We had a great caller who said prior to Obamacare, we had our problems. I mean, people were still complaining about health insurance and its costs. I mean, there wasn’t a panacea. But people had jobs and they had discretional income, and many of them had health insurance through work. Many of them had private insurance. It was okay. Maybe it was just 20 or 30 million people didn’t have health insurance. For that we blew up what, on balance, was working; and we come up with this unaffordable monstrosity in the name of “compassion” to insure the 30 million who weren’t insured.

It destroyed a perfectly fine system that you existed for the vast majority of Americans, and that’s what preexisting conditions are. When Obama set up the pools… They eventually — if I’m not mistaken — shut those pools down because there were so few people that signed up for it. And the pools were… You didn’t have to… I think you had a nominal payment, but it was nothing like a premium. The point being that the actual numbers of people with preexisting conditions denied insurance was infinitesimally small, given the universe of people in the country. And yet we were rewriting and reorienting national health care policy based on that relatively small number.

There was a much more efficient way of doing both.

If all you wanted to do was insure the 30 million that didn’t have it, do that! It would have cost 1/39th of what Obamacare costs. But there wouldn’t have been any more power or control gained in Washington if you did it that way. The preexisting condition argument was another made to order argument for how unfair America is and how rotten insurance companies are. “Look at all the people with preexisting conditions that are just being allowed to get sick and die,” and it was all a magnified story to portray America as heartless and cruel — and, of course, the Republican Party as part of it and the insurance companies to boot.

And so we blew up, for the most part, a relatively functioning system to accommodate two relatively small groups who could have been accommodated with much smaller plans that would have accomplished the same thing without throwing the whole baby out with the bathwater. To the point now where we had a call who said the way to fix health care, preexisting conditions, everybody that has ’em gets covered, and your kids up to 26 could stay on your policy, and then if you don’t want to buy it, you don’t have to.

Well, I’m telling you, if you’re gonna cover preexisting conditions and then give people a chance not to buy health insurance, you can’t do both. You’re gonna have to pay for it somehow. And that was the whole point of Obamacare, to get people who didn’t need it to pay for it, to, on paper, fund those who couldn’t afford it or the most sick among us, that would be the elderly. The whole thing was a giant ruse that ended up transferring more and more power and money to Washington, D.C. And that’s why I oppose those things.

If you want to cover people that have preexisting conditions and insurance companies won’t give them coverage, find a way to pay for it with a different program that’s not called insurance, because it isn’t. We do this all the time. We are a compassionate people, and we treat and try to care for everyone. The homeless, the hungry, the thirsty, hell, folks, we even provide education and health care for illegal aliens, for crying out loud.

Read more at RushLimbaugh.com.


Bookdoc said...

100% correct from the MajaRushi. Insurance is paying something so you don't get stuck with massive bill if the unexpected happens. Covering pre-existing conditions is like allowing people to buy fire insurance as their house burns down.
The idea of government control is intoxicating to libtards. I also figure they must plan on all the people involved in the program will be good government union employees meaning more money for seiu and afscme which means even more campaign contributions and, of course, outright bribes.

JaneLovesJesus said...

There is a difference between a person who went without insurance than got sick & is demanding their pre-existing condition be covered; and a person who consistently maintained coverage, got sick, then wound up losing coverage due to no fault of their own (like an employer switching carriers, now they have to re-enroll). No, insurers should not be allowed to deny you. You played by the rules.