Monday, November 09, 2009

Let's try tallying the bodycount before worrying about the 'backlash'


Hopefully Ace doesn't dispatch his black-clad ninja assassin zombie-killers -- who carry 1911's and shurikens dipped in Raid! and drink battery acid for fun -- to terminate me for repro'ing his whole post. And highlighting the Line o' the Day™.

Everyone's First Thought After Hearing About "Possible Muslim Backlash" in the Media? "My God, How Many Have They Killed This Time?"


We're not even done tallying up the latest bodycount before we again have to be instructed about the dangers of "backlash."

In this case, the "backlash" feared is a feminist writer at Pajamas Media stating the inarguable: We have to begin "connecting the dots" and stop the deadly doublethink that is getting people killed.

But that is part of the "backlash" CNN now worries about: Connecting the dots to avoid future terrorism.

Incidentally, if we did connect the dots and stopped the Islamically Correct bull*** and arrested Hassan earlier (for any number of violations of the military code) we would not even have to fear any "backlash," because no heinous mass-slaughter would have occurred.

Oh, and 15 people would still be alive today. If that matters any more. Apparently it doesn't, because I keep being told by the media that only Muslim lives matter. Only future harassments and inconveniences to Muslims matter; thousands of non-Muslim lives may be sacrificed on the altar of jihadist freedom in order to spare a single innocent Muslim a moment's worth of stink-eye.

If this much-feared speculative hypothetical alt-future "backlash" does occur, by the way, here will be the reason for it: Because citizens have learned they cannot trust their government, or the so-called "watchdog" media, to protect their lives when threatened by an Islamist.

I call it blood sacrifice on the altar of political correctness.

At this juncture, it's always worth re-reading "No Substitute for Victory", the finest epistle on the topic ever written. IMO, of course.

Via: Larwyn.

No comments: