RUSH: Benghazi Just Blew Up in Bob Schieffer's Face

Not that you've ever watched the show, but an octogenarian named Bob Schieffer reportedly hosts CBS News' Deface the Nation. It was on that show, and several others, that Obama apparatchik Susan Rice was trotted out to market absolute falsehoods in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attack.

Earlier today, Rush Limbaugh used everything but brass knuckles and two-by-fours on Schieffer and the fascist media that used Benghazi as a platform to attack Mitt Romney and protect Barack Obama.

...[An important aspect of this] particular story ... is that Greg Hicks says that he knew Susan Rice was lying when she appeared on those five talk shows, and he was not happy about it.


He knew she was lying when she said that all this happened because of this video. And the fourth point that's made, according to Greg Hicks, is that Susan Rice directly contradicted the president of the Libya who said Benghazi was a terrorist attack right before she came on, and this led Libya to delay the FBI's access to Benghazi. Do you remember we were all wondering, "Where's the FBI? Why aren't they there?" Well, the reason is the president of Libya had been embarrassed on TV. He was on CBS and he said it was a terrorist attack...

...He finishes, and Susan Rice comes out and says, "No, no, no, it wasn't a terrorist attack. It was this video guy!" The president of Libya said, "You're gonna call me out like that?" So he kept the FBI at bay and delayed their access to Benghazi, which hurt their investigation tremendously...

...For weeks after the administration continued to try to blame the video, some video that nobody had seen. The filmmaker, by the way, of that video is still in jail somewhere in California. Hillary and Obama cut public service announcement type commercials that ran on Pakistan TV, apologizing for the United States and that video, claiming that all of this protest activity had nothing to do with anything other than that video.

None of that was true. Bob Schieffer, ABC, NBC, Washington Post, New York Times, MSNBC, CNN, you name it, all ran with the video story for weeks. And now the number two man is coming forth and saying none of that is true. That's what this is all about. Bob Schieffer's got an exclusive here 'cause Hicks' testimony was leaked to them first, his upcoming testimony. So all of this that is being reported yesterday and today in the Drive-By Media was known before the election, folks, all of it was. So Obama gets reelected under false pretenses under a timeline story that's made up.


...Who was the person most attacked in the days after the Benghazi attack? Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney was the person most attacked in the media after Benghazi because he dared issue a statement after the protests in Cairo. He dared act presidential during the campaign, and the media launched into him as creating problems for America. It's not his role to speak out. It's not his responsibility. He shouldn't be doing it. He should shut up. Mitt Romney was portrayed as an absolute irresponsible idiot for jumping to conclusions...

[The key question is:] "How can we trust them to deal with anything?" This is my point. I practically beg people to understand: When looking at what the Democrat Party does, and everything they control -- the State Department this case -- everything is political. Everything is tied to an agenda. It's their agenda and their party first, and you have to look at them that way. It's not a question of trusting the State Department. How do you trust them to deal with anything? You have to learn to interpret the Democrat Party as moving their political agenda forward with every instance that happens in life.

That's a great point. If given the choice between doing what's best for the American people and advancing the progressive agenda, the typical Democrat will pretend the first option doesn't even exist.