MAP: Which Muslim Countries are Sealing their Borders to Prevent an Onslaught of Syrian Refugees?

Perhaps the Obama administration could explain why American cities and towns are being forced to accept Syrian refugees (and, according to ISIS, terrorists hidden among them) when the wealthiest Arab countries are sealing their borders.

Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism. Although the oil rich countries have handed over aid money, Britain has donated more than Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar combined.

Between 10 and 12 million Syrians have been displaced by the bloody civil war raging in their country. Most still remain within Syria’s borders, but around four million have fled over the borders into neighbouring countries, mostly Turkey Jordan and Lebanon, and beyond.

Lebanon, which has 1.1 million Syrian refugees, shut her borders to the Syrians in June of last year. Jordan, host to another 630,000, followed suit in August last year, preventing more Syrians from abandoning their country...

The schmucks at The New York Times insist that the United States must do what Muslim countries refuse to: accept Syrian refugees infused with hard-core ISIS terrorists.

That's not me asserting the terror threat: that's ISIS saying it.

But don't worry, folks: Barack Obama and John Kerry are on this.


Hat tip: BadBlue News.