The data has been and continues to be manipulated and lied about; original data is not kept, "massaged" data is claimed to be original, records that don't comport with what someone wants to show are either ignored, buried, modified or even erased and those who challenge the "narrative" are drummed out of their positions or are even threatened with prosecution and lawsuits.
We have known for a couple hundred years that solar flux -- that is, the amount of energy the Sun emits toward Earth (and everywhere else) varies on a roughly 11-12 year cycle. The reason isn't really a function of the sun's
What we haven't really figured out, until apparently now, is exactly why these cycles occur. There have been many theories but that's all they have been because they refused to verify across past experience -- and had little predictive power.
In other words you could see a
That data and analysis, if it proves up not only in a backtest (which it has) but forward
That is, specifically,
The last time this happened was in the mid 1600s and it lasted about
Please note that during the last hundred years, during which our supposed CO2 emissions have caused all the warming,
This leads to a very cogent argument that CO2 is not the
If this discovery verifies, and we'll know within a decade whether it looks like it's going to and we spend trillions of dollars mitigating that which we cannot change as
I challenge those pushing this narrative today over in France, as well as everywhere else, with this: If you are wrong, and it is in fact solar emission that causes these shifts,
In short, if you are one of the people supporting the "global warming" screamfest and by doing so you intend to grossly increase the cost of living to mitigate what you claim will be an unspeakable tragedy that will otherwise happen,
Re Karl Denninger