Will's recent temper tantrum in print implied that the establishment should consider support for Hillary Clinton and asserted that the GOP may splinter because the party leadership didn't get its way.
Similarly, Krauthammer has been a constant critic of Trump's run, calling him a "rodeo clown" and "deeply bigoted" for his proposal to suspend Muslim immigration* until the San Bernardino terror attack can be deconstructed.
It's also fair to say that strict adherents of Islam, who believe Sharia law takes precedence over the laws of the United States, are already prohibited from immigrating to the United States:
The Immigration and Nationality Act passed June 27, 1952 [prohibits] entry to the US if the Alien belongs to an organization seeking to overthrow the government of the United States by "force, violence, or other unconstitutional means." [It] prohibits the entry of Aliens who are members of or affiliated with any organization that [would] publish, circulate and distribute materials teaching or advocating the overthrow by force, violence or other unconstitutional means of the US Government or of all forms of law.
Islamic immigration to the US would be prohibited under this law because the Koran, Sharia Law and the Hadith all require complete submission to Islam, which is antithetical to the lgovernment, the Constitution, and to the Republic. All Muslims who attest that the Koran is their life's guiding principal subscribe to submission to Islam and its form of government. Now the politically correct crowd would say that Islamists cannot be prohibited from entering the US because Islam is a religion. Whether it is a religion is immaterial because the law states that Aliens who are affiliated with any "organization" that advocates the overthrow of our government are prohibited. It also prohibits those who distribute literature that advocates the overthrow of our country, which would include the Koran.
They should be asked the following questions:
One: Despite landmark victories in 2010 and 2014, Republican leaders have ceded their Constitutional powers, ignored the will of their constituents, and refused to offer budget bills using regular order. Why haven't you used your bully pulpits to insist that Republicans negotiate away some of Mr. Obama's most damaging programs using the power of the purse?
Two: Americans overwhelmingly support (by a 14-point margin) construction of a border fence and aggressive deportations of illegal alien criminals. Why haven't you taken up the cause of border security and pilloried Republicans for failing to follow through on their promises?
Three: The Obama-Kerry Iran deal, which could be the most damaging national security agreement in American history, could have been stopped in Congress but for Republican leadership. Why haven't you sounded the alarm, over and over again, calling out Mitch McConnell, Bob Corker, and their ilk for offering $150 billion to a terror state dedicated to the destruction of the United "Great Satan" States?
Gentlemen: if you cared about the wellbeing of the American people -- versus, say, the Chamber of Commerce -- you might better understand their rage and frustration.
Trump may not be a conservative, but he has given voice to Americans of every race, religion, color and creed who believe that the Republic, its Constitution and its tenets must be protected from invasion and usurpation at all costs.
And they do not see the elites in Washington -- of either party -- lifting a finger to address their concerns.
And because you have blithely ignored their increasing unease, you can be said to having helped give birth to the Trump phenomenon.
You are reaping what you have sown.
Hat tip: BadBlue News