Monday, October 28, 2013

Benghazi Whistleblowers: Obama Went to Sleep Refusing to Authorize Rescue; Commanders Relieved of Duty for Trying

The Right Scoop has the full interview of Benghazi whistleblower attorney Joe DiGenova. DiGenova appeared to confirm our worst suspicions regarding the unconscionable behavior of Barack Obama on the night of 9/11/2012.

…There is more to learn about Benghazi. Panetta has never told the full story.

Here’s an interesting question. Remember General Ham and what happened the night of the assault on the American embassy? We have reason to believe that things happened that night in the chain of command where people were relieved of their duties because they insisted that there be a military response. We’re working on trying to establish that with some news organizations but there’s very, very good evidence that people were actually relieved of command because they refused not to try and dispatch troops and some response.

And by the way, this notion that the administration has put out – it’s this little straw-man that [the] military couldn’t have landed in Libya, Greg Hicks has testified and so have some other military people that if there had only been a flyover, that would have dispersed these crowds because they remembered what the American military did its flyovers and its assaults.

There were planes in Croatia that could have been there by the time of the attack on the annex and no planes were ever sent. That was because the president of the United States refused to issue an order allowing for the dispersal of military into Libya because that was considered an act of war. The president, himself, who went to sleep, refused to issue some order.

You know, Panetta is not a bad man. He knows what went wrong that night. He’s never been properly questioned about this and pressed. And if he were he would admit all of this stuff.

In addition to Panetta, perhaps someone should subpoena Frau Jarrett?


Hat tips: BadBlue News and BB.

7 comments:

Redwine said...

Yes. Panetta and Frau Jarrett absolutely MUST be subpoenaed. I also think that Shrillary must testify again, this time under oath. However, I don't believe that Issa has the guts to do this.

TheFineReport.com said...

Barack Obama is a child. And a malignant one.

He is the real-life 'Chance,' from the movie 'Being There:'

Based on Jerzy Kosinski's satirical novel about an illiterate gardener who has lived his entire life behind the walls of a Washington, D.C., house, Chance's only knowledge of the world coming from the TV programs he watches. When his employer and protector dies, he is catapulted into the fast lane of political power and is set to become president of the US.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcPQ9gww_qc

'Chance' would have made a better president than 'Barack Obama.'

TheFineReport.com said...

Barack Obama is a child. And a malignant one.

He is the real-life 'Chance,' from the movie 'Being There:'

Based on Jerzy Kosinski's satirical novel about an illiterate gardener who has lived his entire life behind the walls of a Washington, D.C., house, Chance's only knowledge of the world coming from the TV programs he watches. When his employer and protector dies, he is catapulted into the fast lane of political power and is set to become president of the US.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcPQ9gww_qc

'Chance' would have made a better president than 'Barack Obama.'

Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, but how do I know Panetta is not a bad man? If he's not forthcoming with the actual details here, doesn't that kinda/sorta disprove your statement?

Francis W. Porretto said...

Add this to the ever-growing mountain of deceits over Obamacare, and what does it spell for history's judgment of Barack Hussein Obama?

Stan Burton said...

Congress is a bunch of pussies. In a REAL courtroom, if a witness refused to testify the bailiff would haul their ass directly to jail until the judge decided they could see the light of day again. if someone refuses to testify in front of congress they wring their hands....

Anonymous said...

It's become very clear that the administration knew that that video had nothing to do with the events in Libya. It would be outrageous enough if they put a man in jail for exercising his free speech on the grounds that he his responsible for a riot by people who didn't like what he had to say. But even that was not what was going through the minds of Obama and Hillary. They put a man in jail just to cover up their own incompetence.