Thursday, October 31, 2013

Larwyn's Linx: Obama’s Boston Speech on Health Care, Deconstructed

Send us tips! Bloggers: install a Larwyn's Linx widget. Get real-time news, 24/7, at BadBlue.


Obama’s Boston Speech of Health Care, Deconstructed: HayRide
7 Most Ridiculous Things Kathleen Sebelius Said At Today’s Hearing: NRCC
The Wages of Presidential Deception: Victor Davis Hanson

McCain: We'll Slam in Amnesty Once GOP Gets Past Primaries: MB
13 Democrats Who Destroyed Healthcare Up for Reelection in '14: Hideout
Awesome: Rep. Renee Ellmers SCHOOLS Sebelius on maternity care for men: Scoop

Terry McAuliffe – Do You Believe How Bad This Guy Is?: Sentinel
Cuccinelli Closing In on McAuliffe : RS
Ted Cruz uses Obama to explain ‘stand your ground’ to Trayvon’s mother: Sara Noble


All union health insurance plans grandfathered in: S&L
Obama re-demonizes insurance industry: LI
Bumbling Mary Landrieu wants to bring back your old health care plan: HayRide

Obama Lied, Healthcare Coverage Died: Matthew Vadum
…And People Still Believe This Guy!: Liberal Logic 101
Obamacare’s Brownshirts Starting To Get Burned Out: BuzzFeed

Scandal Central

Obama tells insurers to shut up if they know what's good for 'em: John Hayward
Election Integrity Activists: Obamacare 'Biggest Voter Registration Fraud Scheme in History': Breitbart
Obamacare website design FOIA: JW

Pelosi on Failure: “This Is What Happens When You Do Something Big”: IsThatBaloney
New FBI Agents Ordered to Pay Homage at MLK Memorial: MB
The Thuggery of Obamacare Czarina Kathleen Sebelius: Michell Malkin

Climate & Energy

‘We can’t just drill our way to lower gas prices.’ Says who?!: Steve Maley


Another Democrat, Another Race Card: VodkaPundit
It's All In the Face: iOTW
Jon Stewart grills Wasserman Schultz about “troubling” effects of Obamacare: RedAlert

The New Yorker Publishes Racist Character Assassination of Cruz: Jeremy Boreing, TruthRevolt
7 Awesome Things That Took Less Time Than Jon Gabriel
Obama Heckled During Health-Care Speech in Boston: Breitbart

Sebelius does impression of people getting Obamacare-induced insurance cancellations: Michelle Malkin
Western Rifles: Yup
Obama's Biggest Lie: iOTW


Ted Cruz criticizes DOJ for arguing international treaty can trump the Constitution: Joel Gehrke
Soros and Hillary Take on America: Matthew Vadum
The Amnesty Trigger: AWD


NSA secretly tapping Google’s, Yahoo’s data pipelines to harvest metadata — and content: Hot Air
Google Glass accessory store quietly comes online: NextWeb
Huge magma reservoir beneath Yellowstone 2.5 times larger than expected: Rich McCormick, The Verge


Obamaboat: Denny
Incoming!! All Available Boots on the Ground!: MOTUS

Image: Humanity’s 50 best breakthroughs since the wheel
Sponsor: VIRGINIANS: McAuliffe and Bloomberg Are Coming For Your Guns! SUPPORT KEN CUCCINELLI.

QOTD: "What does it take to warn Americans about unchecked pension growth, socialized medicine, vast increases in entitlements, higher taxes, and steady expansion of government? In other words, what is it about Detroit, Italy, or Greece that we do not understand?

In the last five years, the Obama administration has raised taxes on the top income rates, implemented Obamacare, added millions to the disability and food stamp roles, grown the size of the federal work force, run up the national debt, and vastly expanded the money supply, along with insuring near zero interest rates. Are there any historical examples where these redistributive efforts have brought long-term tranquility and prosperity?" --Victor Davis Hanson


Anonymous said...

At what point does a bug realize that he can't overcome the gravitational swirl in a toilet bowl?

Anonymous said...

Most preppers should be familiar with the ‘rule of three’ – this means having one main method of an important function and a backup for it and a backup of the backup. It doesn’t necessarily entail 3 versions of the same thing but distinctly different ways of accomplishing a priority task.

In the case of personal security arrangements, the main or level 1 version would be firearms within easy reach within a structure. These would be the primary weapons used for hunting and defense.

And while it’s been said that the time to hide weapons is the time to bring them out, the rule of three would dictate that a level 2 backup of the primary firearms should at least be considered. There are no guarantees as to the future but unknown threats such as governmental seizures or devastation of a structure must be considered in all plans and preparations.

Level 2 backups should be outside the immediate area but easily accessible in an underground or similar storage cache. The weapons should be set in waterproof PVC piping or the similar waterproof containers with additional scrap metal and scent distraction materials scattered about to foil determined searches. The presumption here would be that even with destruction of a home or bug out location or search and seizure operation a set of weapons would still be immediately available to the prepper.

Level 3 backups are a step removed from level 2 in that this backup is set at a distance and without a personal connection to the prepper. This means an underground cache on raw land unlikely to be disturbed in the near future. No personal connection means weapons purchased privately beyond the government’s prying eyes.

Anonymous said...

Advantageous level 3 locales would be places where the cache would likely remain undisturbed, has a ready supply of decoy material nearby and relatively accessible. Long lost junkyards or metal dumping grounds would a good choice as well as rural backwoods with their requisite amounts of discarded trash. Such places would readily discourage searches with metal detectors and in the case of rural road frontage be of such vast amounts as to make detection of the cache highly improbable. Weapons destined for level 3 caches should be of the lower cost realm and lacking a pedigree lest they be inadvertently discovered.

Just as an aside, when data is stamped in materials such as metal, the stamping process tends to place the molecules a fair distance beneath the data under stress. This stress can manifest itself in form of visual indications even after the data has been abrasively removed. Grinding the material down to remove the indications of the data leaves the stress in molecules below and certain chemicals – acids and the like can be utilised to determine what the data was while still present on the surface of the material. Given this interesting phenomenon, it would seem like applying additional stress on the molecules would cause this not to be the case. Writing over the data would scramble the stresses within the material while rendering the data unreadable. Hammering the data in the same region would not only remove the original data but also remove the original l data’s stress indications deep in the material. In most cases areas with a great deal of metallic debris would be less than ideal for searches of this attribute of the cache. By the same token, the inclusion of chemical propellant components should suffice the placement of similar component with similar chemicals in the surroundings. Several handfuls of spent casing from the local range should do the trick and would satisfy both decoy requirements.

In summation, it should be incumbent on the prepper to have 3 personal security backups as with every other functional task such as the procurement of water. For most preppers, firearms are a priority are a foundational basis on their survival. Loss of personal security arrangements renders all other preps useless.