Answer: when that tech news website is called Mashable. Consider a couple of their recent stories, designed to garner sympathy for actual bloodthirsty war criminals (no links for obvious reasons; simply search for the headline and you'll find it if you decide you prefer to read Hamas marketing material):
• 'Am I Going to Die, Daddy?' The Child in Gaza Asked by Jon Snow
• U.N. Official Warns of Gaza War Crimes; Only U.S. Votes Against Investigating by AP
• 45000 Londoners Protest Israel's Operation in Gaza by Colin Daileda
• 13 Anonymous Admissions From Israelis About Gaza on Whisper by Brian Ries
• UN Made Clear It Was Sheltering Kids But School in Gaza Still Got Hit by Mashable Team
• Israel Is Losing Control of the Gaza Media War by Colin Daileda
• A Day in Gaza: A Destroyed Hospital and 'Gut-Slamming Explosion' by Jonathan Miller
• Thousands Flee Major Battle With Israel in Gaza, Death Toll Tops 420 by the AP
• Israeli Airstrikes Injure Three Journalists in Gaza by Brian Ries
PJMedia's Bryan Preston rightfully asks, "Is Tech Site Mashable.com Siding with Hamas Terrorists?"
In “‘Am I Going to Die, Daddy?’ The Child in Gaza Asked,” reporter Jon Snow states that “If the Israelis have proved anything, it is that there is no such thing as a forensic strike.” Snow never allows for the fact while Israel tries to avoid civilian casualties, while Hamas feeds on them.
After chronicling several heart-breaking cases of kids caught up in the crossfire, Snow rhetorically asks “Can they really be the acceptable collateral damage of targeting militants?”
The tone of the entire piece puts the moral responsibility for all casualties in Gaza not on Hamas, the terrorist group that is still dedicated to destroying Israel and which started the current conflict, but on Israel...
Today’s and tomorrow’s Israelis are paying a price too, are they not? You wouldn’t know it from reading Jon Snow, or indeed anything published at Mashable...
...Snow’s piece fits well within Hamas’ anti-Israel propaganda. Why is a tech site like Mashable publishing it?
It's almost as if Snow and Mashable are operating as a free public relations firm for one of the most bloodthirsty terror groups in the world, and one that is a a direct descendant of Nazi Germany.
Here's one of many videos secretly taped in Gaza that Mashable won't show you: Hamas terrorists savagely beats Gaza civilians who heed IDF calls to leave targeted areas, for instance.
Mashable also won't tell you that the Hamazis are forcibly strapping suicide belts to children and sending them into Israeli lines at gunpoint.
Hamas is committing war crimes daily, using civilians as human shields and targeting innocents with their thousands of rockets.
Hamas is a group with direct ties to the Third Reich and Adolf Hitler.
Why Mashable is promoting this Nazi sickness is beyond me, but it is reprehensible. There is no moral equivalence between Hamas and Israel, none.
Hat tip: BadBlue Tech News (of which Mashable is no longer a member).
1 comment:
a positive aspect of the current intifada is the black/white stance people are taking. Mashable is guilty of siding with murderers.
I'd add VICE to this list. I've been a subscriber of VICE for a few months now, and recently all their videos have been from Palestinian areas. They are the YouTube version of CNN. They visit morgues and are shown bodies of children, and they film staged mobs of outraged "victims."
I think the real reason VICE is in the Palestinian areas is because Israelis munitions are precision whereas Palestinian weapons are not...
Post a Comment