Steven Goddard relays the following graph that illustrates the startling dichotomy between the global cooling deniers' rhetoric and this little thing we like to call unadulterated data.
Which reminds me: Christopher Booker well summed it up the other day at London's Telegraph, noting that, "Any theory needing to rely so consistently on fudging the evidence ... must be looked on not as science at all, but as simply a rather alarming case study in the aberrations of group psychology."
In fact, warmal colding is a complete fraud, the product of generous government grants (at our expense), the same United Nations that brought you such classics as "Oil For Food", and carbon trading hustlers like Al Gore.
For those unfamiliar with the climate grift, I long ago prepared a brief history of the scam, complete with pictures and small words for Democrats.
Hat tip: BadBlue News