To be fair, that's a trick question. No country does, though a few come close. Perhaps Canada, Israel, and the U.S. for starters (though in the latter case, said attributes appear to be eroding on a daily basis).
So why would any rational American support an elite group of 100+ barbaric, tyrannical regimes? That's a rhetorical question, because we already do -- not by the consent of the governed, mind you -- and it's called "The United Nations" (or "U.N."). And the UN, by dint of numbers, supports Islamists, terrorists and other anti-civilization throwbacks.
Did you know the United Nations runs a car rental office just for bloodthirsty terrorist pig-dogs?
AlQaeda affiliated Nusra Front driving around with a UN vehicle. Thats their flag on the car (v @BSyria @akhbar) Pic pic.twitter.com/pExYuz5dVO
— Jenan Moussa (@jenanmoussa) August 31, 2014
If you're a little bit late to the party, it's true: the United Nations actively supports terrorism.
One day, I pray, we elect a Constitutional conservative president. And one of their first acts is to completely defund the UN, boot it out of New York City, and name John Bolton the Secretary of State. For spite.
Yeah. I went there.
Hat tips: The Right Scoop and BadBlue News.
5 comments:
Yes, you did go there, and I'm with you 100%.
John Bolton would be very welcome as Secretary of State in my world.
I used to think the UN was a useless waste of time, money and personnel.
Now I think it's all that as well as being downright dangerous.
IOW, cut all ties.
Agree about Bolton.
You had me till "John Bolton". That man's name went off my list when he burst into the elections office where they were counting the Florida vote in 2004 and hollered, "I'm from the Republican party and I'm here to stop the count."
Anyone who figures elections are about NOT counting the vote won't be getting support here.
creeper
Sorry. Wrong year. 2000.
creep
Post a Comment